To gain deeper insight into the model’s decision-making
process, we employed EigenCAM visualization techniques,
which highlighted the specific regions within the images that
contributed most significantly to the model’s predictions. The
activation maps revealed that YOLOv9 effectively
concentrated on the relevant features of the panicles, even in
the presence of challenging background elements such as dense
vegetation and overlapping structures. Qualitative assessments
further confirmed the model’s ability to localize and detect
panicles under diverse and complex conditions, although
certain limitations, including occasional misdetections in areas
of dense foliage and partial occlusions, were observed.
Nonetheless, the overall performance underscores YOLOv9’s
potential for application in precision agriculture, particularly
for automated rice yield estimation tasks. Moving forward,
future work could explore the integration of more sophisticated
feature extraction methods, augmentation of the dataset with
additional annotated examples from varied environments, and
the incorporation of advanced attention mechanisms to enhance
detection robustness, especially in scenes characterized by
heavy occlusion and visual clutter. Additionally, continued use
of interpretability tools like EigenCAM can provide valuable
feedback for further model refinement and ensure more
transparent, reliable deployment in real-world agricultural
settings.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Belmir, W. Difallah, and A. Ghazli, “Plant Leaf Disease Prediction
and Classification Using Deep Learning,” in 2023 International
Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), Annaba,
Algeria: IEEE, Sep. 2023, pp. 536–540. doi:
10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286672.
[2] Q. Zhou et al., “Analyzing Nitrogen Effects on Rice Panicle
Development by Panicle Detection and Time-Series Tracking,” Plant
Phenomics, vol. 5, p. 0048, 2023, doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0048.
[3] S. Tan et al., “In-field rice panicles detection and growth stages
recognition based on RiceRes2Net,” Computers and Electronics in
Agriculture, vol. 206, p. 107704, Mar. 2023, doi:
10.1016/j.compag.2023.107704.
[4] X. Lu et al., “Phenotyping of Panicle Number and Shape in Rice
Breeding Materials Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery,” Plant
Phenomics, vol. 6, p. 0265, 2024, doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0265.
[5] G. Sun et al., “A IR M EASURER : open‐source software to quantify static
and dynamic traits derived from multiseason aerial phenotyping to
empower genetic mapping studies in rice,” New Phytologist, vol. 236, no.
4, pp. 1584–1604, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1111/nph.18314.
[6] Z. Li et al., “LKNet: Enhancing rice canopy panicle counting accuracy
with an optimized point-based framework,” Plant Phenomics, vol. 7, no.
1, p. 100003, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100003.
[7] J. Sun et al., “A High-Throughput Method for Accurate Extraction of
Intact Rice Panicle Traits,” Plant Phenomics, vol. 6, p. 0213, 2024, doi:
10.34133/plantphenomics.0213.
[8] J. A. Delgado, N. M. Short, D. P. Roberts, and B. Vandenberg, “Big Data
Analysis for Sustainable Agriculture on a Geospatial Cloud Framework,”
Front. Sustain. Food Syst., vol. 3, p. 54, Jul. 2019, doi:
10.3389/fsufs.2019.00054.
[9] E. Pierpaoli, G. Carli, E. Pignatti, and M. Canavari, “Drivers of Precision
Agriculture Technologies Adoption: A Literature Review,” Procedia
Technology, vol. 8, pp. 61–69, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.010.
[10] R. Gebbers and V. I. Adamchuk, “Precision Agriculture and Food
Security,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5967, pp. 828–831, Feb. 2010, doi:
10.1126/science.1183899.
[11] L. Ma, M. Li, L. Tong, Y. Wang, and L. Cheng, “Using unmanned aerial
vehicle for remote sensing application,” in 2013 21st International
Conference on Geoinformatics, Kaifeng, China: IEEE, Jun. 2013, pp. 1–
5. doi: 10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626078.
[12] J. Wei et al., “A Precise Plot-Level Rice Yield Prediction Method Based
on Panicle Detection,” Agronomy, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1618, Jul. 2024, doi:
10.3390/agronomy14081618.
[13] M. Belmir, W. Difallah, and A. Ghazli, “A Reliable Apple Leaf Disease
Identification Using a Deep Learning-Based MobileNetV2 to Safeguard
Apple Fruit Safety,” in 2024 4th International Conference on Embedded
& Distributed Systems (EDiS), BECHAR, Algeria: IEEE, Nov.
2024, pp. 279–284. doi: 10.1109/EDiS63605.2024.10783370.
[14] M. Belmir, W. Difallah, and A. Ghazli, “Applying Machine Learning
Approaches with Integrated Internet of Things for Water Management
System,” in Intelligent Systems and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2304, A.
Bennour, A. Bouridane, S. Almaadeed, B. Bouaziz, and E. Edirisinghe,
Eds., in Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol.
2304. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 157–168. doi:
10.1007/978-3-031-82153-0_12.
[15] P. K. Sethy, N. K. Barpanda, A. K. Rath, and S. K. Behera, “Deep feature
based rice leaf disease identification using support vector machine,”
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 175, p. 105527, Aug.
2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105527.
[16] A. O. Conrad, W. Li, D.-Y. Lee, G.-L. Wang, L. Rodriguez-Saona, and
P. Bonello, “Machine Learning-Based Presymptomatic Detection of Rice
Sheath Blight Using Spectral Profiles,” Plant Phenomics, vol. 2020, p.
8954085, 2020, doi: 10.34133/2020/8954085.
[17] Z. Song et al., “A Lightweight YOLO Model for Rice Panicle Detection
in Fields Based on UAV Aerial Images,” Drones, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1, Dec.
2024, doi: 10.3390/drones9010001.
[18] S. Sagar and J. Singh, “A Comprehensive Study of Crop Disease
Detection Using Machine Learning Classification Techniques,” in Key
Digital Trends Shaping the Future of Information and Management
Science, vol. 671, L. Garg, D. S. Sisodia, N. Kesswani, J. G. Vella, I.
Brigui, S. Misra, and D. Singh, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Networks and
Systems, vol. 671. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp.
509–525. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-31153-6_41.
[19] F. Xiao, H. Wang, Y. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Fruit Detection and
Recognition Based on Deep Learning for Automatic Harvesting: An
Overview and Review,” Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1625, Jun. 2023,
doi: 10.3390/agronomy13061625.
[20] J. Chappidi and D. M. Sundaram, “A comparative study of animal
detection and classification algorithms, applications and challenges,”
presented at the THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND
PRACTICAL CONFERENCE RAKHMATULIN READINGS,
Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2024, p. 020020. doi: 10.1063/5.0211343.
[21] Sumit, Shrishti Bisht, Sunita Joshi, and Urvi Rana, “Comprehensive
Review of R-CNN and its Variant Architectures,” Int Res J Adv Engg
Hub, vol. 2, no. 04, pp. 959–966, Apr. 2024, doi:
10.47392/IRJAEH.2024.0134.
[22] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, “Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-
Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks,” 2015, arXiv.
doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1506.01497.
[23] J. Terven, D.-M. Córdova-Esparza, and J.-A. Romero-González, “A
Comprehensive Review of YOLO Architectures in Computer Vision:
From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAS,” MAKE, vol. 5, no. 4, pp.
1680–1716, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/make5040083.
[24] W. Liu et al., “SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector,” 2015, doi:
10.48550/ARXIV.1512.02325.
[25] B. Sun et al., “Universal detection of curved rice panicles in complex
environments using aerial images and improved YOLOv4 model,” Front.
Plant Sci., vol. 13, p. 1021398, Nov. 2022, doi:
10.3389/fpls.2022.1021398.
[26] S. Hong, Z. Jiang, L. Liu, J. Wang, L. Zhou, and J. Xu, “Improved Mask
R-CNN Combined with Otsu Preprocessing for Rice Panicle Detection
and Segmentation,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 22, p. 11701, Nov.
2022, doi: 10.3390/app122211701.
[27] X. Liang, J. Zhang, L. Zhuo, Y. Li, and Q. Tian, “Small Object Detection
in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images Using Feature Fusion and Scaling-
Based Single Shot Detector With Spatial Context Analysis,” IEEE Trans.