the reform, but not significantly. Conditional on inpatient care use, among different levels of health facilities, we found a significantly negative
treatment effect of 9.1% (P<0.1) to the log of the length of inpatient stay at county hospitals.
Conclusion:
Our work provides evidence that the combination of supply-side and demand-side incentives can impact the healthcare utilization pattern and
intensity. In rural China, such incentives result in use of inpatient care away from higher-tier health facilities and less intense care delivered at
lower-tier health facilities. These findings provide a practical way of combining supply-side and demand-side incentives for the purpose of
promoting efficient health care use, especially for low- to middle-income countries.
Background: US health care spending has continued to increase and now accounts for 18% of the US economy. Despite the size and growth of
this spending, little is known about how spending on each health condition varies by payer, and how these amounts have changed over time.
Our goal is to estimate US spending on personal health care, according to three groups of payers - public insurance, private insurance, and out-
of-pocket - and health condition, age and sex group, and type of care, for 1996 through 2015.
Data and Methodology: Government budgets, insurance claims, facility records, household surveys, and official US records from 1996 through
2015 were collected to estimate spending for 154 conditions. For each record, information about spending, the age, sex, and health condition of
the patient, and the type of care was extracted. The fraction of the spending paid by public insurance, private insurance, and out-of-pocket
payments was estimated for each health condition, age and sex group, type of care, and year based on household survey data and was used to
estimate health condition spending by payer for each of these categories. Spending growth rates, standardized by population size and age
structure, were calculated for each payer and health condition.
Results: From 1996 through 2015, $39.2 trillion spent on personal health care was disaggregated by payer, 154 conditions, age and sex group,
and type of care. Among these 154 conditions, low back and neck pain had the highest health care spending in 2015, with an estimated $127.9
billion (uncertainty interval [UI], $115.9 billion-$140.6 billion) in spending, with 59.5% (UI, 55.9%-63.6%) from private insurance, and
substantially less spending from public insurance [31.9% (UI, 28.3%-35.3%)] and out-of-pocket [8.6% (UI, 7.6%-9.7%)]. Diabetes mellitus
accounted for the second-highest amount of health care spending in 2015 ($104.7 [UI, $98.6-$111.6] billion) with most spending (53.5% [UI,
47.6% - 59.5%]) from public insurance, and Alzheimer disease and other dementias accounted for the third-highest amount ($93.4[UI,
$68.5-$112] billion), with most the spending (58.0% [UI, 40.3% - 67.2%]) from public insurance. The conditions with the highest spending
levels varied by payer, age, sex, type of care, and year. After adjusting for changes in inflation, population size, and age structure, public
insurance, private insurance, and out-of-pocket annual spending grew at an annualized rate of 2.69% (UI, 2.67%-2.70%), 2.27% (UI,
2.25%-2.29%), and 0.67% (UI, 0.65%-0.69%), respectively.
Discussion: Modeled estimates of US spending on personal health care showed substantial increases from 1996 through 2015, with population
adjusted spending by public insurance growing the fastest. While spending on low back and neck pain, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer disease
and other dementias, accounted for the highest amounts of spending, the payers and the rates of change in annual spending growth rates varied
considerably. This information may help target efforts to curb US health care spending growth.
Background: Decomposing total health care spending by disease, type of care, age and sex can lead to a better understanding of what drives
health care spending. A previous study decomposed total health care spending for Switzerland by 21 major diseases. The main obstacle to a
higher granularity in the disease decomposition was the lack of diagnostic coding in outpatient care. However, health insurance claims data hold
a variety of diagnostic clues, which may be used to identify diseases even in absence of diagnostic coding. We use health insurance claims data
to identify approximately 50 specific diseases according to the exhaustive and mutually exclusive Global Burden of Disease classification.
Data and Methodology: We use claims data from two large private Swiss health insurers providing mandatory health insurance to
approximately 19% of the population. This data includes detailed information on the cost and type of inpatient and outpatient treatments,
examinations, and medication provided to insurees. Diseases are identified in a two-level classification, with major diseases (e.g. neoplasms) on
3:30 PM –5:00 PM MONDAY [Health Care Financing & Expenditures]
Universitätsspital Basel | Klinikum 1 – Hörsaal 2
Organized Session: Measuring Health Care Spending By Health Condition: Methods and
Preliminary Estimates from Switzerland, Norway, and the United States
SESSION CHAIR: Joseph Dieleman, University of Washington
PRESENTER: Mr. Joseph Dieleman, University of Washington
AUTHORS: Ms. Abigail Chapin, Carina Chen, Angela Liu, Taylor Matyasz
Tracking US Health Care Spending By Health Condition and Payer
PRESENTER: Dr. Simon Wieser, Zurich University of Applied Sciences
AUTHORS: Michael Stucki, Maria Trottman, Eva Blozik
Decomposing Outpatient Care Spending By Diseases: The Potential of Swiss Health Insurance Claims Data