- 28 -
The main purposes of this Action Plan is to provide recommendations and possible actions for education sector
in the six Western Balkans economies towards implementing actions in support of the green transition. For the
purpose of this Action Plan, the green transition is understood as a top-down structural process requiring
significant systemic changes across multiple sectors.
However, at the beginning it should be noted that the green transition is not a linear nor fully defined process.
Its implementation varies across national contexts, and its long-term effects, while the subject of numerous
projections and studies, remain largely uncertain. In addition, arguments are being made that often market-
based instruments that are formally encouraging acters to go green, also serve ‘to avoid important systemic,
profound structural reform to our way of producing and living that are actually needed to promote sustainability’
(Cedefop and OECD, 2022). In another words, often mechanisms that formally support and promote
sustainability are designed so that no substantial changes of the means of production are made, which are
necessary for reaching targets set in the Paris Agreement. On this note, Philipp Gonon questions to what extent
the measures introduced have a true effect by mostly relying on consumers than producers, and ‘market
economy logic that promotes prices, competition and incentives rather than prohibition and constraints’ and says
‘There is a gradual recognition and critique that we still have a spirit of 19th century capitalism and industrialism,
trying to make money out of natural resources and leaving a devastated landscape. Many measures, like
producing dirty and offering a green tree afterwards, are, in this respect, greenwashing. Green acts and
greenwashing as nominal support is not backed up by structural decisions; it equals doing something good for
having done something bad’ (Cedefop and OECD, 2022). In short, only structural changes that target the
production mechanism can fully support economies in reaching the EGD targets, and those are seldom
implemented.
Viewed through this lens, a central question arises: what is the role of the education sector in the context of the
green transition? More specifically, how can education systems contribute to this process in a sustainable and
responsible manner? As Gonon states, ‘Regarding climate change, the Agenda 2030 is criticised as being
unrealistic and based on a compromise, while the Climate Action Plan (CAP) aims at measurable results: zero
emissions by 2030. But these are aims for nations and policy and not primarily a question of education.’.
Nonetheless, these policies do have direct implications for education - particularly vocational education and
training (VET), which is the focus of this Action Plan. Those policies quite strongly, place expectations on
education sector to equip individuals with skills and knowledge that contribute to the green agenda. The
articulation of this expectation, it’s true meaning and measure is a subject of many papers and debates written
over the last decade. While uncertainty may indeed characterize the Zeitgeist of early 21st-century societies, one
may find grounds in going back to basics: sustainability in its definition implies more than technical
advancements and/or economic growth. As Gonon argues, ‘education for sustainable development often does
not reach a balance between economic, ecological and social interests; at the end of the day, economic concerns
come first. It seems that small-scale, incremental updates of VET and apprenticeship curricula do not suffice.
Transversal topics should be included in teaching and learning and education should try to reach a concept of
Bildung, which links self-development with the broader society, and therefore provides a better basis to not
exceed the planetary load limits’ (Cedefop and OECD, 2022).