GROWTH OF VIRTUAL REALITY IN SOUTH AFRICA THROUGH EDUCATIONAL ENGINEERING: A CASE STUDY TO ASSESS THE PROS AND CONS PDF Free Download
1 / 10/10
100%
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4340]
GROWTH OF VIRTUAL REALITY IN SOUTH AFRICA THROUGH
EDUCATIONAL ENGINEERING: A CASE STUDY TO ASSESS THE PROS AND
CONS
Hyacinthe Tonga*1
*1Researcher, Department Of Architectural Technology And Interior Design, Nelson Mandela
University, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
ABSTRACT
This case study explores the dynamic growth of Virtual Reality (VR) in South Africa’s higher education
landscape, focusing on its integration within engineering and STEM-related curricula. As educational
institutions face the imperative to modernize learning experiences in response to the Fourth Industrial
Revolution (4IR), VR is emerging as a transformative tool that enhances spatial reasoning, complex problem-
solving, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Through immersive simulations and interactive 3D modeling, VR
has begun to reshape pedagogical approaches by replacing traditional rote learning with experiential, inquiry-
driven education. This study examines how universities of technology and faculties of engineering are
leveraging VR to build industry-relevant competencies among students particularly in design, manufacturing,
and the built environment. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research identifies the key drivers of
adoption, such as institutional innovation policies, public-private partnerships, and increasing digital literacy
among students. At the same time, it critically assesses persistent challenges, including high implementation
costs, uneven digital infrastructure, and a lack of faculty training. By evaluating both the enablers and
constraints of VR deployment, the paper offers practical insights for policymakers, curriculum developers, and
industry stakeholders seeking to scale immersive learning within resource-constrained contexts. Ultimately, it
argues that VR, if inclusively and strategically implemented, holds the potential to bridge educational gaps,
foster engineering innovation, and position South African graduates as competitive contributors to a global
digital economy.
Keywords: 3D Modeling, Virtual Reality (VR), Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), Pedagogy, Engineering
Innovation.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) has redefined the skills, tools, and environments required for
meaningful education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. In this global shift,
Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as one of the most disruptive technologies for reimagining how knowledge is
delivered and experienced, particularly in disciplines where visualization, simulation, and hands-on
experimentation are central to learning [9][14].
In South Africa, the integration of VR into engineering education presents a dual opportunity: to enhance the
quality of learning while also addressing long-standing systemic challenges such as limited access to physical
infrastructure, overcrowded classrooms, and theoretical-heavy pedagogies. Given the country’s history of
educational inequality, immersive technologies like VR hold the potential to democratize access to high-quality,
interactive learning environments regardless of geographic or economic barriers [13].
The engineering and built environment faculties at several South African universities have started
experimenting with VR to teach spatial reasoning, simulate construction projects, and visualize mechanical
systems in 3D. These efforts were also outlined by Makhosazana & Ndlovu (2021), reflecting a growing
awareness that traditional modes of instruction must evolve to keep pace with global industry demands and
prepare students for a digitally enabled workforce.
However, while early adopters are optimistic, the national picture remains uneven. Many institutions face
significant hurdles, including the high cost of VR equipment, lack of technical support, inconsistent internet
access, and limited capacity to develop locally relevant VR content [3][17]. Furthermore, educators often
require extensive training to integrate VR meaningfully into existing engineering curricula.
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4341]
This paper investigates the current growth trajectory of VR adoption within South African tertiary engineering
education. It aims to assess both the positive impacts and the limitations of this integration. Through a focused
case study approach, the research explores the conditions that enable or hinder VR’s uptake, offering strategic
insights for institutions seeking to scale its use. Ultimately, the study contributes to the broader discourse on
how emerging technologies can be responsibly and equitably implemented to advance engineering education
and skills development in the Global South.
II. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
The integration of Virtual Reality (VR) into education represents a significant global trend, driven by the need
for more engaging, interactive, and technologically advanced learning environments. Worldwide, educational
institutions are increasingly adopting VR to support experiential learning, particularly in STEM disciplines
where students benefit from visualizing complex systems, simulating real-world scenarios, and interacting with
data in immersive ways [8][14].
In South Africa, this trend is gradually gaining momentum, shaped by both national educational policy and local
innovation. The Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) has emphasized the importance of
preparing South African students for 4IR, outlining a strategic push for digital skills, emerging technologies, and
curriculum reform in the post-school sector [6]. Within this policy landscape, VR is seen not merely as a
teaching aid but as a catalyst for systemic transformation in higher education especially in fields such as
engineering, architecture, computer science, and industrial design.
Several universities and universities of technology in South Africa have initiated VR-related pilot projects,
funded either through institutional innovation funds or through partnerships with private-sector technology
firms. These initiatives typically involve the use of VR headsets and interactive 3D environments to teach
modules like structural mechanics, fluid dynamics, or CAD-based design. The Faculty of Engineering, the Built
Environment and Technology at Nelson Mandela University, for example, has experimented with VR-based
studios to teach design thinking and construction processes [12]. These projects suggest a growing interest in
developing context-specific VR applications that align with local engineering challenges and curricula.
However, the South African context presents unique challenges that shape the pace and scale of VR adoption.
Socio-economic disparities, a legacy of under-resourced educational institutions, and the digital divide all
contribute to uneven access to immersive learning tools. Ng’ambi et al. (2021) and Makhosazana & Ndlovu
(2021) also mentioned that many rural or historically disadvantaged universities face difficulties acquiring VR
hardware or maintaining the necessary IT infrastructure. Furthermore, educators often lack exposure to VR
technology, making professional development a prerequisite for successful integration.
Despite these challenges, there is growing recognition that VR can support more inclusive and accessible
educational experiences. When aligned with South Africa’s educational goals such as fostering innovation,
enhancing graduate employability, and closing equity gaps VR has the potential to become a key component of
engineering education reform. This study seeks to explore how this potential is currently being realized and to
what extent it is limited by contextual factors. It focuses on understanding the dynamics of VR adoption in
educational engineering settings, offering a case-based lens through which the benefits and drawbacks of this
transition can be critically examined.
III. METHODOLOGY
This study employed a qualitative case study approach to explore the growth of Virtual Reality (VR) in South
Africa’s engineering education sector. The case study method was selected for its capacity to capture in-depth,
contextualised insights into complex phenomena particularly where technological adoption is shaped by
institutional, economic, and pedagogical factors [2]. Given the exploratory nature of the research and the
evolving landscape of immersive education in South Africa, this approach provided a robust framework for
understanding both enablers and barriers to VR implementation.
3.1 Research Design
The research design was informed by an interpretivist paradigm, which values subjective meaning and
stakeholder perspectives. The study focused on a single embedded case: the integration of VR in engineering
faculties at selected South African universities, with a primary emphasis on institutions engaged in 4IR-aligned
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4342]
teaching and innovation initiatives. This allowed for a holistic examination of the phenomenon within a
bounded real-world context.
Figure 1: Methodology process linked to this study.
3.2 Data Collection
Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and participant observations:
Interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, including faculty members, curriculum designers, IT
support staff, and postgraduate students involved in VR-integrated modules. A total of 12 interviews were
completed, each lasting approximately 45–60 minutes. Questions focused on perceived benefits of VR, technical
and pedagogical challenges, institutional support mechanisms, and student engagement.
Document analysis included institutional reports, curriculum briefs, 4IR strategy documents, and internal
evaluations of pilot VR projects. These materials provided background on the motivations and funding
structures behind VR adoption.
Participant observation was carried out during live demonstrations and workshops hosted by universities
piloting VR in engineering education. These sessions offered insights into how VR technologies were used in
practice and how students interacted with them.
3.3 Sampling Strategy
A purposive sampling technique was used to select participants and institutions actively engaging in VR
initiatives. The sample included universities of technology, research-intensive universities, and partnerships
involving educational technology firms. This sampling ensured representation across different institutional
types and geographic locations within South Africa, including urban and semi-urban campuses.
3.4 Data Analysis
Data were analysed thematically, following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework for thematic
analysis. Transcripts were coded using NVivo software, allowing for identification of key patterns across
interviews and documents. Themes were clustered around enablers (e.g., funding, infrastructure, innovation
culture), barriers (e.g., cost, training, access), and outcomes (e.g., improved student engagement, curriculum
alignment).
3.5 Ethical Considerations
The study obtained ethical clearance through the university’s Research Ethics Committee (REC-H).
Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was secured from all interviewees. Anonymity and
confidentiality were maintained throughout, and no students directly taught by the researcher were involved in
the study, in compliance with institutional ethical protocols. All collected data were securely stored and used
solely for academic purposes.
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4343]
Figure 2: Data analysis process linked to this study.
3.6 Limitations
While the case study approach provided deep insights, it is inherently limited in its generalisability. The focus
on a select group of institutions may not reflect the broader spectrum of higher education contexts across South
Africa. Furthermore, the reliance on qualitative data may overlook measurable outcomes of VR adoption, such
as academic performance or cost-effectiveness, which are suggested areas for future research.
IV. FINDINGS
The analysis of data collected from interviews, observations, and document reviews revealed several key
themes regarding the adoption and impact of Virtual Reality (VR) within South African engineering education.
These findings are grouped into three thematic categories: enablers, barriers, and educational outcomes. Each
theme illustrates how institutional context, technology readiness, and pedagogical practices influence the
integration of immersive learning technologies.
4.1 Enablers of VR Integration
Several factors were identified as critical in supporting the growth of VR initiatives across case study
institutions:
Leadership and Vision: This finding aligns with Ng’ambi et al. (2021); Institutions with strong leadership in
digital transformation were more likely to embed VR into strategic planning. Faculty champions and innovation
units played a pivotal role in piloting VR modules.
Access to External Funding and Partnerships: This finding aligns with DHET (2020); Universities that had
established relationships with industry players or received innovation grants (e.g., from DHET or private tech
firms) were able to procure VR hardware and develop custom educational content.
Innovation Culture within Faculties: This finding aligns with Gadelha (2022); Faculties with a culture of
experimentation and interdisciplinary collaboration (e.g., between architecture, IT, and engineering) were
more agile in integrating VR into both teaching and assessment practices.
Supportive Infrastructure: This finding aligns with Makhosazana & Ndlovu (2021); Reliable campus Wi-Fi,
dedicated VR labs, and access to trained technical support staff were cited as key enablers for consistent use of
VR in coursework.
4.2 Barriers to Implementation
Despite growing enthusiasm, several persistent challenges limited the scope and effectiveness of VR adoption:
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4344]
High Initial Costs: This finding aligns with Al-Ayyoub et al. (2020); Participants highlighted that VR headsets,
compatible computers, and development software remained prohibitively expensive for most departments,
particularly at historically disadvantaged institutions.
Limited Staff Capacity: This finding aligns with Brown (2022); A lack of professional development
opportunities for lecturers resulted in low confidence to integrate VR meaningfully into existing curricula.
Some faculty members were unfamiliar with immersive pedagogies or resisted adopting unfamiliar tools.
Curriculum Misalignment: This finding aligns with Turner (2015); Inflexible or outcomes-heavy curricula
often did not accommodate exploratory or experiential learning tools like VR, especially in regulated
programmes such as civil or mechanical engineering.
Digital Inequality Among Students: This finding aligns with Van Deursen & Helsper (2018); While some
students thrived in immersive environments, others faced exclusion due to lack of access to devices at home,
poor digital literacy, or discomfort with virtual interfaces.
4.3 Educational Outcomes and Impact
Where effectively implemented, VR contributed to improved student experiences and learning performance in
several ways:
Increased Engagement and Motivation: Students reported higher levels of focus and interest when learning
through immersive environments compared to traditional lectures. VR labs were described as “fun,”
“challenging,” and “memorable” by participants.
Enhanced Spatial Understanding: This finding aligns with Radianti et al. (2020); Engineering and design
students were able to manipulate 3D models, experience scale and proportion firsthand, and simulate real-
world technical environments skills that are difficult to teach using 2D drawings or static software.
Collaborative and Reflective Learning: This finding aligns with Marques et al. (2021); VR was used not only
for individual tasks but also for group-based design critiques and walkthroughs. This fostered peer learning
and critical reflection, particularly in architecture and industrial design projects.
Emerging Evidence of Skills Transfer: This finding aligns with Ramdass (2022); Although limited, some
lecturers observed that students exposed to VR performed better in studio critiques, spatial analysis exercises,
and real-world internships, suggesting early signs of applied learning benefits.
Figure 3: key themes summary regarding the adoption and impact of Virtual Reality (VR) within South African
engineering education.
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4345]
These findings highlight the complexity of VR adoption in South African higher education: while the technology
holds immense promise for transforming engineering education, its success is contingent on equitable access,
institutional preparedness, and meaningful pedagogical integration.
V. PROS OF VR GROWTH IN EDUCATIONAL ENGINEERING
The expansion of Virtual Reality (VR) within South Africa’s educational engineering landscape has introduced
several clear advantages, which are transforming how knowledge is delivered, experienced, and retained. This
section outlines the primary benefits emerging from the integration of VR into engineering education, based on
findings from both the case study and current academic literature.
5.1 Enhanced Learning Outcomes
VR enables students to interact with complex engineering principles through immersive, real-time 3D
visualizations. Concepts such as thermodynamics, stress analysis, fluid dynamics, and structural behavior
traditionally taught using static images or equations can now be explored in simulated environments, greatly
improving comprehension and long-term retention [14]. This form of experiential learning caters especially
well to visual and kinesthetic learners, reducing cognitive overload and promoting deeper understanding
through spatial and interactive engagement.
5.2 Practical Simulations and Safe Experimentation
One of the most significant advantages of VR is the ability to simulate real-world environments and processes
that would otherwise be costly, logistically complex, or hazardous. For example, civil engineering students can
conduct bridge load tests, mechanical students can dismantle virtual engines, and construction learners can
participate in scaffold erection exercises all without leaving the classroom [8]. These practical simulations offer
safe, repeatable training opportunities that mitigate risks, reduce costs of physical materials, and offer real-time
error feedback without consequence to equipment or personnel.
5.3 Bridging Theory and Practice
VR supports a more applied, experiential mode of learning by allowing students to test theoretical concepts in
action. In virtual labs and design studios, learners receive real-time feedback on their decisions, simulating the
iterative nature of real-world engineering workflows. This bridge between abstract learning and tangible
experience prepares students for industry expectations, encourages critical thinking, and enhances problem-
solving capabilities core skills demanded by employers in sectors like manufacturing, architecture, and
infrastructure development [9][15].
5.4 Scalability and Reusability
Once VR systems are implemented and modules are developed, they can be scaled across multiple courses and
departments with minimal additional investment. Unlike physical labs, which may have capacity or material
limitations, VR environments can be reused, updated, and adapted for various disciplines, student levels, or
design briefs [3]. This makes VR a cost-effective solution in the long term, particularly for institutions seeking
to broaden access to high-quality engineering education despite resource constraints.
5.5 Boosting Global Competitiveness
Exposure to immersive technologies such as VR not only enhances domestic education but also positions
graduates to compete in global engineering, construction, and design industries. Employers increasingly seek
candidates familiar with digital tools, Building Information Modelling (BIM), simulation software, and real-time
collaboration platforms. By equipping students early with VR fluency, South African institutions can contribute
to a workforce that is both future-ready and adaptable to emerging trends in digital construction, smart
manufacturing, and transdisciplinary innovation [11][18].
VI. CONS AND CHALLENGES
While the integration of Virtual Reality (VR) into South African engineering education presents promising
opportunities, the findings of this study highlight a range of systemic and contextual challenges. These issues
rooted in technological, financial, curricular, and human resource constraints pose significant barriers to the
sustainable and equitable expansion of immersive learning technologies in the country.
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4346]
6.1 High Setup and Maintenance Costs
The upfront costs associated with establishing a functional VR learning environment remain a major obstacle.
Institutions must invest in high-performance computers, VR headsets, motion sensors, dedicated lab spaces,
and technical support staff. In addition, licensing fees for educational content or software such as Unity or
Autodesk add to recurring costs. For universities already facing budgetary pressures particularly historically
disadvantaged institutions these capital outlays can be prohibitive [1][6]. Furthermore, maintaining and
upgrading hardware regularly is essential, as outdated equipment quickly becomes incompatible with new
software versions.
6.2 Digital Inequality and Exclusion
South Africa continues to struggle with a deeply entrenched digital divide. While some students have access to
high-speed internet, personal devices, and well-equipped university facilities, many others especially those in
rural areas do not. This disparity extends to access to VR tools, creating uneven learning experiences within the
same programme. Students without home access to digital infrastructure are unable to revise VR-based content
or complete immersive assignments outside the classroom, reinforcing educational inequality and undermining
inclusive learning principles [17].
6.3 Curriculum Misalignment and Institutional Inertia
Another significant barrier lies in the misalignment between VR tools and existing engineering curricula. Many
academic programmes remain structured around traditional instructional models that prioritise lecture-based
delivery and summative assessment. These rigid frameworks leave little room for the integration of simulation-
based, exploratory, or project-based learning activities that VR supports [16]. Moreover, bureaucratic hurdles
in curriculum review and accreditation processes often delay the formal adoption of new digital pedagogies,
even when pilot projects show positive outcomes.
6.4 Lack of Staff Training and Confidence
The successful deployment of VR in education depends heavily on the capacity and willingness of academic staff
to adopt and integrate technology. However, many lecturers particularly those from non-digital backgrounds
lack the technical skills or pedagogical training needed to use VR effectively in their classrooms. Currently,
professional development offerings in this area are limited, underfunded, or optional. As a result, adoption
tends to rely on a few “digital champions” within departments, making projects vulnerable to staff turnover and
burnout [3][11].
6.5 Limited Availability of Localised Content
Most VR educational content used in South African institutions is imported or developed for Euro-American
contexts. This creates a mismatch between what students experience virtually and the realities of local
infrastructure, building regulations, environmental conditions, and cultural practices. For example, a VR
module simulating construction practices in Europe may fail to consider the informal settlements, resource
scarcity, or material usage typical in many African urban developments. The absence of contextualised content
reduces the relevance and pedagogical value of VR, particularly in disciplines where local specificity is essential
[10].
6.6 Sustainability and Institutional Integration
A final challenge concerns the long-term sustainability and institutionalisation of VR. Many VR initiatives begin
as short-term pilot projects funded by external grants, and once that funding ends, the projects risk being
deprioritised or discontinued. Without a clear strategy for scaling and embedding VR across departments and
curricula, these innovations remain isolated and disconnected from broader institutional goals [13].
Additionally, in the absence of evidence-based policies, there is limited guidance on best practices, benchmarks,
or standards for immersive education in South Africa.
The growth of VR in South African engineering education faces considerable hurdles, many of which stem from
structural inequalities, under-resourced institutions, and slow curricular reform. Addressing these challenges
requires a coordinated effort from universities, government, and industry stakeholders to ensure that VR is not
only accessible but also relevant, sustainable, and equitably integrated into the educational fabric of the
country.
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4347]
VII. IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The findings of this study underscore the transformative potential of Virtual Reality (VR) in advancing
engineering education in South Africa. However, they also reveal significant structural and pedagogical
challenges that must be addressed to ensure equitable and sustainable implementation. This section outlines
the broader implications of the research and offers recommendations targeted at key stakeholders:
institutional leadership, policymakers, educators, and industry partners.
7.1 Implications for Higher Education Policy and Planning
The adoption of VR within tertiary engineering education has implications for national digital learning policy.
Institutions that successfully integrate VR do so not simply by acquiring hardware, but by aligning technology
adoption with curriculum development, faculty training, and infrastructural investment. This suggests that VR
should not be seen as an isolated intervention, but rather as a catalyst for broader educational transformation.
Similar suggestions were also made by Van Deursen & Helsper (2018) and DHET (2020).
Moreover, the uneven distribution of VR capabilities across historically advantaged and disadvantaged
institutions highlights the urgent need for systemic equity strategies. Without coordinated policy support and
funding models, VR could inadvertently widen the digital divide in South African higher education.
7.2 Recommendations
(1) Institutional Commitment and Strategic Integration: Universities should embed immersive technology into
their strategic teaching and learning frameworks, rather than treating VR as a peripheral or experimental tool.
This includes aligning VR adoption with long-term goals for graduate employability, 4IR readiness, and
curriculum renewal. Similar recommendations were also made by Makhosazana & Ndlovu (2021).
(2) Curriculum Reform and Academic Flexibility: Similarly to Turner (2015) and Gadelha (2022); Engineering
faculties need to adapt curricula to accommodate experiential and simulation-based learning. This involves
updating course outcomes, creating space for cross-disciplinary projects, and adopting assessment models that
recognize immersive learning achievements.
(3) Faculty Development and Support: Institutions must invest in ongoing staff training, including workshops
on VR pedagogy, content development, and student facilitation. Similarly to Brown (2022); A dedicated
instructional design unit or a digital learning innovation centre could provide sustained support to lecturers
integrating VR into their courses.
(4) Funding Mechanisms and Resource Sharing: To overcome high entry costs, institutions should pursue
partnerships with the private sector, government, and NGOs. Regional collaboration between universities could
facilitate shared VR labs, pooled procurement of headsets, and co-developed open-source content tailored to
South African contexts.
(5) Local Content Development: There is a pressing need for VR content that reflects local infrastructure,
environmental conditions, engineering standards, and languages. Similar recommendation were made by
Harrison & Thomas (2019); Supporting student and staff participation in VR content creation will increase
ownership, relevance, and cultural resonance.
(6) Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: A robust framework for evaluating the effectiveness of VR in improving
learning outcomes is essential. Radianti et al. (2020) also recommended that institutions should track usage
data, student performance, and feedback, and feed these insights into continuous improvement strategies.
(7) Student Access and Digital Equity: Similarly to the recommendation made by Aesaert et al. (2015), any
expansion of VR use must include inclusive access strategies, such as loan programs for devices, offline-
compatible content, and inclusive orientation sessions to ensure that all students can participate regardless of
their socio-economic background.
7.3 Broader Impact
If implemented with care, VR can address many of the spatial, infrastructural, and pedagogical limitations that
currently constrain engineering education in South Africa. Beyond improved student engagement, it can also
serve as a platform for decolonised, future-oriented learning, preparing graduates to participate meaningfully
in a globally competitive and digitally complex workforce [15][18].
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4348]
VIII. CONCLUSION
This study has shown that Virtual Reality (VR) holds significant potential to transform engineering education in
South Africa, especially in contexts marked by infrastructural constraints, large student cohorts, and limited
access to hands-on facilities. Aligning ourselves with Ramdass (2022) and Gadelha (2022); When strategically
and thoughtfully implemented, VR enhances the quality of learning by making abstract engineering concepts
more tangible, promoting interactive engagement, and supporting the development of critical spatial and
technical skills. In resource-constrained environments, where physical laboratories may be limited or
overstretched, VR offers an innovative alternative that can democratize access to high-quality learning
experiences.
Furthermore, the study illustrates that immersive technologies are not simply tools for novelty but are key to
preparing students for the complex, digitally mediated workplaces of the future. In disciplines where design
thinking, prototyping, and real-world simulations are vital, VR facilitates deeper experiential learning and
fosters interdisciplinary innovation. It enables students to engage in safe experimentation, iterative problem-
solving, and collaborative project work all essential for thriving in 4IR-aligned industries.
However, despite its advantages, the widespread and sustainable integration of VR in South African higher
education faces serious obstacles. The challenges ranging from prohibitive costs, curriculum misalignment, and
undertrained academic staff to the digital divide affecting students reveal the need for systemic, coordinated
solutions. Without deliberate planning, adequate investment, and institutional readiness, VR risks becoming a
fragmented or elitist tool rather than a transformative force in education.
As such, the way forward lies in developing an inclusive immersive learning ecosystem one where VR is not
only technologically accessible but also pedagogically purposeful, contextually relevant, and socially just. This
requires national and institutional policies that support curriculum reform, professional development, and
equitable infrastructure deployment. It also calls for stronger collaborations between universities, government,
and industry to localise content, pool resources, and scale innovation.
Virtual Reality offers an unprecedented opportunity to modernise South Africa’s engineering education. It has
the power to bridge systemic gaps, reimagine learning environments, and cultivate a generation of graduates
who are future-ready, design-literate, and globally competitive. But to unlock this potential, institutions must
move beyond experimental use and embrace VR as a strategic instrument for transformation, deeply aligned
with the broader goals of inclusive, high-quality, and future-oriented education.
IX. REFERENCES
[1] Al-Ayyoub, M., et al. (2020). Emerging technologies in education. Education and Information
Technologies, 25, 1169–1197.
[2] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
[3] Brown, T. (2022). Digital fluency in higher education: Gaps and future strategies. South African Journal
of Higher Education, 36(2), 89–104.
[4] Chikuni, P., et al. (2023). Engineering education for 4IR in Africa. Journal of Engineering Education
Africa, 12(1), 45–62.
[5] Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.
[6] DHET. (2020). Strategic Policy Framework on the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Post-School
Education and Training. Department of Higher Education and Training, South Africa.
[7] Dlodlo, N. (2020). Virtual reality and IoT applications in African education. IEEE International
Conference on Industrial Engineering.
[8] Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education. eLearning &
Software for Education.
[9] Gadelha, R. (2022). The future of immersive learning: Beyond simulations. International Journal of
Educational Technology, 9(1), 15–27.
[10] Harrison, B., & Thomas, M. (2019). Identity and agency in VR-based learning. Educational Media
International, 56(1), 1–13.
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:07/Issue:06/June-2025 Impact Factor- 8.187 www.irjmets.com
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[4349]
[11] Makhosazana, N., & Ndlovu, S. (2021). The role of emerging technologies in South African higher
education. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102373.
[12] Marques, B., Sousa Santos, B., & Dias, P. (2021). Ten years of immersive education: A review of VR and
AR in postgraduate courses. Computers & Education, 163, 104097.
[13] Ng’ambi, D., et al. (2021). Higher education in a digital era: South African case studies. SAUVCA Report
on Blended Learning.
[14] Radianti, J., et al. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher
education. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
[15] Ramdass, K. (2022). Engineering education in South Africa: Emerging technology and innovation.
Journal of Professional Engineering Education, 12(4), 85–94.
[16] Turner, J. (2015). Pedagogical shifts for digital transformation. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4),
389–401.
[17] Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2018). Digital inequality in skills. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1239–
1258.
[18] World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023.
