
is done. We are made witness in the tale of her life to the story of an itinerant laborer
whose own destruction is meant to mirror the disappearance of the traditional
English countryside. Although the subtitle of Tess of the D’Urbervilles, “a pure
woman,” suggests that the novel relates to the fortunes of its heroine only, it
actually covers a much larger theme than the destiny of an individual character.
Through the individual tragedy of Tess, the novel’s heroine, Hardy has depicted the
larger theme of the destruction of English peasantry. More than any other novel in
English between Fielding and Hardy, it is this novel which has the quality of a
social document. It is, in fact, what is characterized as the thesis.
The thesis here is that the disintegration of the English peasantry, or the
agrarian way of life, having had its beginning in the eighteen century, reached its
final and tragic stage in Hardy’s own time. The process began with the extension
of capitalist farming much before Hardy’s time. The capitalist farming is done by
the landowners, not for their own sustenance, but for profit. In this system, the land-
workers became wage-earners. The worst hit by this system were the old yeoman
class of small-holders or peasants. They had been used, for centuries, to a settled
life of continued family occupation of farming, having a culture of their own, living
an independent life. With the arrival of capitalist farming, with big players to buy
lands from small-holders and cultivate it for profit, making the occupation of
farming a business and an industry, this peasant class of yeoman was bound to
disappear. The new forces of industry and business were too strong for these poor
people. It disrupted the age-old traditions, and gradually destroyed them. Since the
way of life of the English peasantry has been deep-rooted, its destruction was highly
painful and tragic. Tess is a powerful story and symbol of the destruction of this
traditional way of life. Tess Durbeyfield is a peasant girl, who belongs to the stock
that was under threat of disintegration at the time. Her parents belong to a class
ranking just above the farm-laborer’s. It is a class, as the novel explains, “including
the carpenter, the smith, the shoemaker, the huckster, together with non-descript
workers other than farm-laborer’s; a set of people who owed a certain stability of
aim and conduct to the fact of their being life-holders, like Tess’ father, or copy-
holders, or, occasionally, small freeholders.” The theme of disintegration is
indicated right at the beginning of the novel. We find that already the Durbeyfield’s
have fallen on bad days. Their plight is by no means solely due to the lack of
stability in the characters of John and Joan. The family’s condition is made worse
by the accident in which their horse gets killed. This accident, as Kettle points out,
is a “striking symbol of the struggles of the peasantry.” The mail-cart “with its two
noiseless wheels, speeding along these lines like an arrow” runs into
Tess’ slow, unlighted wagon. The peasants, driving their carts without
light, were often found on the wrong side of the road.
The moral commentary running through the novel insists that Tess is not at
fault in imposing mythological, biblical and folk imagery on a story of a young girl
seduced and abandoned to create a "challenging contemporaneity". It was
controversial and polarizing, setting these elements in a context of 19th-century
English society, including disputes in the Church, the National School movement,
the overall class structure of English society, and changing circumstances of rural
labour. During the era of first-wave feminism, civil divorce was introduced and
campaigns were waged against child prostitution, moving gender and sexuality