At the cultural support level, it is essential for the board of directors to lead the cultivation
of a compliance ecosystem where there is "no desire, no ability, and no intention to violate
regulations." This can be achieved by strengthening awareness among all employees
through mechanisms such as regular training, performance assessments, and the reporting
of violation cases. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the compliance department has
an independent budget, dedicated personnel, and cross-departmental investigation authority.
Notably, the "Measures" simultaneously strengthen the accountability mechanism. In addition
to imposing hefty fines for violations, they also hold directors, senior executives, and
compliance officers jointly liable. However, a "self-correction exemption" clause is
established to encourage companies to develop a closed-loop mechanism for proactively
identifying and rectifying issues. This series of reforms signifies that financial compliance
regulation in China has officially entered a new stage of "systematic governance, preventive
control, and comprehensive participation.“
2. Challenges of Compliance Management for Domestic Enterprises Going Public in
2025
Under the dual pressures of the implementation of the "Measures" and the continuous
tightening of financial regulation, domestic companies planning to go public or already listed
are facing the challenge of systemic compliance restructuring. Companies are required to
complete the appointment of a Chief Compliance Officer, the establishment of an
independent compliance department, and the revision of their institutional systems within a
one-year transition period. However, organizational restructuring often involves the
reallocation of cross-departmental responsibilities and the redesign of decision-making
processes. For instance, business departments may need to cede some approval authority to
the compliance officer, which could trigger internal interest conflicts and delay progress.
The deeper conflict lies in the clash between compliance requirements and business
efficiency. The regulations stipulate that compliance review must be deeply integrated into
core aspects such as product design and transaction decisions. This means that financial
institutions need to structurally modify traditional processes like credit approval and asset
management product creation. For instance, a certain securities firm was forced to add a
related-party penetration check in its IPO sponsorship business, resulting in a 30% extension
of the project cycle.
2 0 2 4 年10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Meanwhile, compliance with
information disclosure has
become the "Sword of
Damocles" hanging over the
heads of listed companies.
Regulatory authorities require
the establishment of a
comprehensive management
system that covers data
collection, content review, and
risk warning. Any slight oversight could lead to class-action lawsuits triggered by
discrepancies in performance forecasts or omissions in ESG information. In 2025, a city
commercial bank once faced investor claims amounting to 230 million yuan due to a 48-hour
delay in disclosing the net value of its financial products.