CBI VISION Business Compliance Management Monthly Journal 2025 MAR PDF Free Download

1 / 17
4 views17 pages

CBI VISION Business Compliance Management Monthly Journal 2025 MAR PDF Free Download

CBI VISION Business Compliance Management Monthly Journal 2025 MAR PDF free Download. Think more deeply and widely.

香港
北京
上海
广州
HONG KONG
BEIJING
SHANGHAI
GUANGZHOU
西安
槟城
伦敦
XI’AN
PENANG
LONDON
CBI
VISION
Business Compliance Management
Monthly Journal
Pursuing Truth · Building Trust
2025 MAR
CONTENTS
Compliance Hotspot
Case Sharing
Compliance Information
Huawei OD Recruitment Fraud: A Warning and
Reflection on Corporate Compliance Management
Loopholes
In March 2025, an internal audit announcement from Huawei sparked
public outcrytheir outsourcing positions (OD positions) recruitment
system was found to have large-scale fraudulent activities, involving over
a thousand outsourced employees and nearly a hundred regular
employees, with the amount involved exceeding 67 million yuan. This
incident, referred to as the "Huawei Recruitment Scandal," not only
exposed management loopholes in leading tech companies but also
revealed systemic risks associated with third-party recruitment
collaboration models.
In the pharmaceutical industry, compliance is the lifeline of a company,
and any violation of regulations can have profound impacts on the
business. Recently, Sichuan Haimeng Zhisen Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
(hereinafter referred to as "Haimeng Zhisen") and its contracted
manufacturing company, Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
(hereinafter referred to as "Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical"), were
disqualified from the selection of Phloroglucinol Injection due to violations
and have been placed on the non-compliance list.
New Compliance Regulations for Financial Institutions in
2025 and Addressing Challenges in Listing Compliance
The "Measures for the Compliance Management of Financial Institutions,"
which will be officially implemented on March 1, 2025, systematically
reconstructs the compliance management system of financial institutions
in China. The core objective is to promote the transition of compliance
management from "passive response to regulation" to "proactive risk
governance." These measures integrate compliance rules across sectors
such as commercial banking, insurance, and securities, and for the first
time establish a unified framework covering the entire industry.
Analysis of the Cancellation of the Selection
Qualification for Haimeng Zhisen Trimethoprim Injection
PREFACE
PREFACE
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Huawei OD Recruitment Fraud: A Warning and Reflection on
Corporate Compliance Management Loopholes
In March 2025, an internal audit announcement from Huawei sparked public outcrya large-
scale fraud was discovered in its outsourcing positions (OD positions) recruitment system,
involving over a thousand outsourced employees and nearly a hundred regular employees, with
the amount involved exceeding 67 million yuan. This incident, referred to as the "Huawei
Recruitment Scandal," not only exposed management loopholes in leading tech companies but
also revealed systemic risks associated with third-party recruitment collaboration models.
Compliance Hotspot
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
The investigation reveals that some employees
and third-party organizations have formed a
complete black market chain: from resume fraud,
technical test proxies, and interview question
leaks to "salary commissions" after employment.
Each step has a clear price tag. For example, job
seekers need to pay a 20,000 RMB "referral fee"
upfront and then have 3,000 RMB deducted from
their monthly salary for a year. Moreover, some
suppliers exploited vulnerabilities in Huawei's
system to illegally obtain 65,000 resumes and
improperly recommended nearly 3,000 people for
employment, resulting in the company paying
over 50 million RMB in additional service fees.
The root cause of the fraud incident in Huawei's recruitment this time lies in the imbalance
between management mechanisms and values under the pressure of business expansion. To
quickly fill the vacancies in OD positions, some teams, in order to meet recruitment KPIs, tacitly
allowed third-party vendors to lower background check standards, falsify candidate resumes,
and even leak exam arrangements for substitutes, resulting in "hiring with issues" becoming the
norm.
Meanwhile, companies have excessively delegated core responsibilities, such as resume
screening and organizing written tests, to third-party agencies without establishing a dynamic
monitoring system. This has resulted in long-term, unchecked violations like suppliers altering
results and selling resumes.
More seriously, a culture of corruption has seeped into grassroots management. For
example, in a department in Chengdu, the entire process from resume screening to hiring
has been infiltrated by a corruption network. Managers not only partake in the spoils but also
suppress internal whistleblowing through intimidation, revealing the systemic collapse of
organizational culture following the failure of institutional constraints.
The Huawei incident is not an isolated case; the compliance loopholes it exposed are
common in the technology industry.
Outsourcing Collaboration Model: The Uncontrolled "Transfer of Power“
The OD position serves as a core channel for "outsourcing to permanent" transitions at
Huawei and is supposed to reserve talent through a strict selection process. However, in
practice, third-party suppliers have been granted critical permissions such as initial resume
screening and organizing written tests, without effective constraints. For example, a certain
supplier has been able to send hundreds of unqualified candidates to Huawei by fabricating
project experiences and altering test scores, while the company relied solely on the "formal
background check reports" provided by the supplier, failing to cross-verify key information
such as social security records and project achievements.
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
The technological measures to prevent corruption are lagging behind.
Desp ite Huaw ei's advan ced technologi cal re searc h and deve lopmen t ca pabil it ies, it s
recr uitment sys tem s till has s ignificant flaws:
Data s i los: Wri tten te st, inter v iew, and b ackgroun d ch ec k data are d ispersed acr os s
different systems, m akin g it im possible to achie ve full process tr aceabili ty .
Lack of blo ckcha in techno logy: Te chnologie s such as timestam ps and hash values ha ve
not been used to so lidif y ope rat ion recor ds, m ak in g it diff i cu lt to ob tain evid ence of
fraudulent activi ties .
Absence of AI ri s k cont ro l: The ident ifica tion of re su me fraud re lies on ma nual rev ie w,
and no AI semant ic analy si s model has been est abl ish ed to detect in con s ist enc ie s in
resu mes .
The ass essmen t m ech anism distorts compl iance logic.
Some departm ents, in order to meet re cru itm ent KPI s, h ave de ve loped a ske wed focu s on
"qua ntit y o ver qu al ity. " An involve d emp lo yee can did ly adm itted in an i nternal l etter, "The
lead ership re qui res 20 new h ire s each m onth . Complia nce checks slow do wn the proces s,
so we have no cho i ce but to take sh ort cu ts. " This "effi c ienc y -f ir st" min ds et h as redu ce d
comp lian ce checks, which sho uld be a fundam ental safeg uard, to m ere formalities .
The fai lure of the rep orting mechanism encoura ges a min dset of ta king chances.
Desp ite having inte rna l m onit or ing ch an nel s, Huawe i emp loyees gener al ly fear retal iat ion
after repor ting i ss ues . An anony mous in ter v iewe e r eveale d, "D epartment le aders are
dire ct ly in volved in the cor rup tion ; w ho wo uld dar e to report it? Eve n if som eone speak s
up, the invest igat ion team might be tipped off in advance ." The la ck of a protectiv e
whist leblowin g system all ows fr aud ulen t act iviti es to remain hidden for a l ong tim e.
The company's corrective actions following similar incidents should not be limited to
emergency measures like "dismissal and accountability." Instead, it should build a systematic
defense from three dimensions: technology, systems, and culture.
Fro m a t echn ical per spe ct ive, compan ie s should ac ce lera te dig ita l tran sfo rm ation by
adop ting bl ockch ain te chn olog y to cre ate tamper -pr oof r ecor ds for the ent ir e recr ui tm ent
proc ess (re sume sub mi ss io n, wr itt en tests, inte rv iews, and bac kgro und ch ec ks) , the reb y
elimi nat ing the possi bi lity of alterin g scor es or fa bri catin g cred ent ia ls. Add it ion al ly, AI
tool s sho uld be uti li zed to c ros s-ver ify c andidat es' re sumes w ith publ ic l y ava il able
info rm ation, aut oma ti ca ll y identif ying in cons i sten ci es su ch as t ime di sc rep an cie s or
inf late d job title s . Fur ther more, by empl oy in g a dynamic ac ces s manage men t system, th e
oper ational scop e of th ir d-party ven dors can be restr icted in spec if ic st ag es (e.g.,
allowing access to question b anks but pro hibiting m odificat ions to resumes).
Fro m an inst itutiona l pers pecti ve, it is neces sar y to rest ru ctur e outso ur cing co ope ration
rule s. T his inc lud es estab li sh ing a "comp liance po ints " s ystem for sup pl iers,
imp lement ing a "one-strike" polic y for data tamp ering and resu me fraud, and a ddin g
offenders to an indu stry blac kl is t. Addit io nal ly , the rec ru it ment p rocess shou ld
inco rp ora te inde pendent background checks by HR, bu sines s depar tme nts, and
comp l iance team s. Fo r c on tentious cand ida tes, a three -pa rty joint re v iew shou ld be
initiated . Furth erm ore , labor c ontr act s sho uld in cl ude ret roa ctive c lauses that clear l y
stat e the c ompany 's r igh t to rec over tra ining in ves tme nts and undue gains obt aine d by
fraudsters .
Fro m a cu lt ura l s tandpoint, it is es sen ti al to deeply em bed c omp lianc e a war eness into
the fa bri c of the o rga nizat ion . Th is can be a ch iev ed by imp lemen ti ng a sy ste m of
manager ia l jo in t accoun tability, lin k ing team v io latio n rat es d ire ct ly to m ana gerial
perform anc e e valuat ions, and establi sh ing an anonymous reporting channel independent
of the busin e ss s ystem . V erified wh istl eblo wers sho uld be re warded with pro motion s and
bonu ses . Addit iona l ly, v ir tual real it y te chno lo gy can be used to si mulate cor rup tion
scen ar io s, a llowi ng emplo ye es to e xper ie nce f ir stha nd the dual impac t of m i sc onduct on
thei r per sona l careers an d the company 's r epu tati on . T his appro ach he lps to fo ster a
shar ed va lue con se nsus of "no t dari ng to corrupt, not bein g able to corr up t, and not
want ing to cor rup t."
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
The Huawei incident once again confirms a harsh reality: in the frenzy of capital expansion
and technological iteration, companies often view compliance as a "cost item" rather than a
"survival item." It is not difficult to find from the cases of multiple tech companies that similar
risks are particularly prominent in areas such as outsourced recruitment, cross-border
mergers and acquisitions, and data transactions. For example, in 2024, a major internet
company experienced a significant safety production accident due to a third-party labor
dispatch company falsifying health certificates.
Currently, leading companies are facing dual pressures: on one hand, industry competition is
forcing the normalization of flexible employment models such as on-demand (OD) work; on
the other hand, regulatory bodies are intensifying the enforcement of laws like the Anti-Unfair
Competition Law and the Personal Information Protection Law. If companies fail to establish
a "firewall" in their outsourcing collaborations, they not only risk hefty fines but also
jeopardize the sustainability of their talent strategies.
In this case, several involved suppliers possess "human resource service qualifications" but
have become accomplices in fraud. This warns companies that qualification certificates do
not equate to compliance capability. Huihua suggests that when selecting partners,
companies should focus on examining their historical compliance records, data security
systems, and internal monitoring processes, rather than making decisions based solely on
industry rankings.
Huawei has revealed through a period of intense challenge that compliance is not a shackle
that binds innovation, but rather a cornerstone for long-term success. For all enterprises, only
by deeply integrating compliance into their strategy, technology, and culture can they build a
solid defense in an era of uncertainty.
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Analysis of the Event of Cancellation of Selection
Qualification for Haimeng Zhisen Phloroglucinol
Injection
2 0 2 4 10月刊
In the pharmaceutical industry, compliance is the lifeline of a company, and any violation of
regulations can have profound impacts. Recently, Sichuan Haimeng Zhisen Biopharmaceutical Co.,
Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Haimeng Zhisen") and its contracted manufacturing enterprise
Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical")
were disqualified from the selection of phloroglucinol injection due to violations and were placed on
the non-compliance list. This incident not only dealt a significant blow to the companies involved but
also sounded the alarm for compliance management in the pharmaceutical industry. This article will
provide an in-depth analysis of the incident from the perspectives of its background, reasons for the
violations, punitive measures, and insights for the industry.
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Case Sharing
The injection of phloroglucinol is one of the selected
drugs in the tenth batch of national drug centralized
procurement (hereinafter referred to as "centralized
procurement"). The national drug centralized
procurement is a significant policy in China's
pharmaceutical sector, aiming to reduce drug prices
through bulk purchasing, alleviate the financial burden
on patients, and promote the standardized development
of the pharmaceutical industry. As the main supplier of
phloroglucinol injection, Haimeng Zhisen successfully
won the bid and obtained the supply qualification.
However, on the eve of the centralized procurement implementation, Haimeng Zhisen and its
commissioned manufacturing enterprise Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical were disqualified from
selection due to violations, an event that garnered widespread attention. According to the
investigation by the National Joint Office for Drug Centralized Procurement, the violations of Haimeng
Zhisen and Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical were mainly reflected in the following two aspects:
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
First, Haimeng Zhisen made relevant commitments in the application materials but failed to fulfill
them. During the centralized procurement process, companies are required to submit detailed
application materials and make commitments regarding the quality and supply capacity of their drugs.
Haimeng Zhisen promised that its products met the requirements of the national Good Manufacturing
Practice (GMP) for pharmaceuticals during the application process. However, subsequent
investigations revealed that its actual production situation did not align with its commitments, and
there were serious quality management issues.
Secondly, Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical, as the entrusted manufacturing enterprise of Haimeng
Zhisen, failed to strictly adhere to the relevant regulations of the "National Drug Centralized
Procurement Document (GYD-Y2024-2)." Entrusted manufacturing is a common collaboration model
in the pharmaceutical industry, but both the entrusting party and the entrusted party are responsible
for the quality and compliance of the drugs. Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical did not meet GMP
standards during the production process, resulting in the inability to ensure the quality of the
Metaraminol Injection.
The National Joint Office for Centralized Drug Procurement has made the following disciplinary
decisions regarding the aforementioned violations:
Cancellation of Selection Qualification: The selection qualification for Haimeng Zhisen's
phloroglucinol injection has been officially canceled, meaning that the company will not be able to
participate in the supply work for this round of centralized procurement. Additionally, since Haimeng
Zhisen is the primary supplier, its supply responsibilities will be taken over by the alternate company.
If the alternate company cannot meet the supply demands, the relevant departments will initiate
procedures to supplement the supply with additional companies.
Listed on the Violation List: Haimeng Zhisen and Sichuan Taiji Pharmaceutical have been included
in the "Violation List," which is an important tool used by the state to publicize and penalize
pharmaceutical companies for non-compliance. Companies listed on the violation list will face strict
supervision and restrictions.
Suspension of bidding qualifications: Starting from March 18, 2024, Haimeng Zhisen and Sichuan
Taiji Pharmaceutical will be suspended from participating in the national centralized drug
procurement activities for a period of two years and six months, until September 17, 2026. During this
period, both companies will be unable to participate in any national organized centralized drug
procurement activities.
Cease Production and Sales: Starting from March 21,
2024, Haimeng Zhisen will cease the production and
sales of phloroglucinol injection. This measure aims to
prevent substandard drugs from entering the market
and to ensure the safety of patients' medication.
The violations by Haimeng Zhisen and Sichuan Taiji
Pharmaceutical serve as a profound warning for
compliance management in the pharmaceutical
industry.
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Most importantly, enterprises must place a high emphasis on the implementation of Good
Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for pharmaceuticals. GMP is a fundamental requirement to ensure
the quality and safety of drugs, and any violations of GMP will severely damage the reputation and
operations of the enterprise. On the other hand, when participating in the national centralized drug
procurement, enterprises must strictly adhere to relevant regulations to ensure the authenticity and
completeness of the application materials. False promises or concealing facts can not only lead to the
cancellation of selection qualifications but may also result in more severe penalties.
Not only that, but the compliance risks in the contract manufacturing model also deserve attention.
The client and the contractor should clearly define their respective responsibilities and establish a
strict quality management system to ensure that the entire drug production process complies with
national standards.
In corporate compliance management, strengthening internal compliance training and enhancing
employees' compliance awareness are key elements to ensuring the long-term and stable
development of a company. Particularly in the pharmaceutical industry, compliance is directly related
to the quality of drugs, patient safety, and the company's reputation. Therefore, companies must
eliminate violations at the source.
Firstly, enterprises should establish a systematic compliance training program that covers all levels,
from top management to frontline employees. The training content should include not only national
laws and regulations and industry standards (such as GMP, GSP, etc.) but also the company's
internal management systems and operational procedures. The training methods can be diversified,
such as online courses, offline lectures, case studies, and simulation exercises, to ensure that
employees thoroughly understand compliance requirements. Additionally, since regulations and
standards in the pharmaceutical industry are constantly being updated, companies need to adjust the
training content promptly to ensure that employees are equipped with the latest compliance
requirements.
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Most importantly, enterprises must place a high emphasis on the implementation of Good
Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for pharmaceuticals. GMP is a fundamental requirement to ensure
the quality and safety of drugs, and any violations of GMP will severely damage the reputation and
operations of the enterprise. On the other hand, when participating in the national centralized drug
procurement, enterprises must strictly adhere to relevant regulations to ensure the authenticity and
completeness of the application materials. False promises or concealing facts can not only lead to the
cancellation of selection qualifications but may also result in more severe penalties.
Not only that, but the compliance risks in the contract manufacturing model also deserve attention.
The client and the contractor should clearly define their respective responsibilities and establish a
strict quality management system to ensure that the entire drug production process complies with
national standards.
In corporate compliance management, strengthening internal compliance training and enhancing
employees' compliance awareness are key elements to ensuring the long-term and stable
development of a company. Particularly in the pharmaceutical industry, compliance is directly related
to the quality of drugs, patient safety, and the company's reputation. Therefore, companies must
eliminate violations at the source.
Firstly, enterprises should establish a systematic compliance training program that covers all levels,
from top management to frontline employees. The training content should include not only national
laws and regulations and industry standards (such as GMP, GSP, etc.) but also the company's
internal management systems and operational procedures. The training methods can be diversified,
such as online courses, offline lectures, case studies, and simulation exercises, to ensure that
employees thoroughly understand compliance requirements. Additionally, since regulations and
standards in the pharmaceutical industry are constantly being updated, companies need to adjust the
training content promptly to ensure that employees are equipped with the latest compliance
requirements.
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Finally, companies should establish a comprehensive compliance risk warning mechanism to
promptly identify and address potential compliance risks. Specific measures include regular self-
inspections, risk assessments, and the establishment of an anonymous reporting mechanism. In an
outsourced production model, both the client and the contractor are responsible for the quality and
compliance of the pharmaceuticals. Companies should clearly define the division of responsibilities,
regularly audit the contractor's production facilities and quality management system, and establish an
information-sharing mechanism between both parties to promptly communicate any issues that arise
during the production process.
The incident of Sichuan Haimeng Zhisen Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. having its eligibility for m-
aminophenol injection canceled once again highlights the importance of compliance management in
the pharmaceutical industry. For companies, compliance is not only a legal requirement but also a
cornerstone for gaining market trust and achieving long-term development. It is hoped that this
incident will serve as a wake-up call for other companies in the industry, driving the pharmaceutical
sector towards a more standardized and transparent direction. Meanwhile, relevant authorities should
continue to strengthen regulatory efforts to ensure the smooth implementation of the national drug
procurement policy, providing patients with safe and effective medications.
案例分享
New Compliance Regulations for Financial Institutions
in 2025 and Addressing Challenges in Listing
Compliance
1. Interpretation of the Core Content of the "Measures for the Compliance
Management of Financial Institutions”
The "Measures for the Compliance Management of Financial Institutions," which will be
officially implemented on March 1, 2025, systematically reconstructs the compliance
management system of financial institutions in China. The core objective is to promote the
transition of compliance management from "passive response to regulation" to "proactive risk
governance.
This approach integrates compliance rules from sectors such as commercial banking,
insurance, and securities, establishing for the first time a unified framework that covers the
entire industry. The most groundbreaking reforms are reflected in three major dimensions:
At the organizational structure level, establish a five-tier responsibility system of "the board
of directors bearing ultimate responsibility, the executive team handling specific execution,
business lines assuming main responsibility, the compliance department coordinating
management, and the internal audit department strengthening supervision." Additionally,
financial institutions are required to appoint a Chief Compliance Officer at the headquarters
who reports directly to the board of directors, and provincial branches should be equipped
with dedicated compliance officers. This is to ensure the authority of compliance management
through independent position settings and a compensation assessment isolation mechanism.
At the business process level, it is mandatory to embed compliance reviews into the early
stages of product design and transaction decision-making. By leveraging information
technology tools, dynamic risk monitoring is achieved, forming a compliance network that
"horizontally covers all business areas and vertically spans the entire decision-making and
execution chain." For example, in the credit approval process, actions such as anti-money
laundering screening and related transaction compliance assessments must be completed
simultaneously.
Compliance Information
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
At the cultural support level, it is essential for the board of directors to lead the cultivation
of a compliance ecosystem where there is "no desire, no ability, and no intention to violate
regulations." This can be achieved by strengthening awareness among all employees
through mechanisms such as regular training, performance assessments, and the reporting
of violation cases. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the compliance department has
an independent budget, dedicated personnel, and cross-departmental investigation authority.
Notably, the "Measures" simultaneously strengthen the accountability mechanism. In addition
to imposing hefty fines for violations, they also hold directors, senior executives, and
compliance officers jointly liable. However, a "self-correction exemption" clause is
established to encourage companies to develop a closed-loop mechanism for proactively
identifying and rectifying issues. This series of reforms signifies that financial compliance
regulation in China has officially entered a new stage of "systematic governance, preventive
control, and comprehensive participation.
2. Challenges of Compliance Management for Domestic Enterprises Going Public in
2025
Under the dual pressures of the implementation of the "Measures" and the continuous
tightening of financial regulation, domestic companies planning to go public or already listed
are facing the challenge of systemic compliance restructuring. Companies are required to
complete the appointment of a Chief Compliance Officer, the establishment of an
independent compliance department, and the revision of their institutional systems within a
one-year transition period. However, organizational restructuring often involves the
reallocation of cross-departmental responsibilities and the redesign of decision-making
processes. For instance, business departments may need to cede some approval authority to
the compliance officer, which could trigger internal interest conflicts and delay progress.
The deeper conflict lies in the clash between compliance requirements and business
efficiency. The regulations stipulate that compliance review must be deeply integrated into
core aspects such as product design and transaction decisions. This means that financial
institutions need to structurally modify traditional processes like credit approval and asset
management product creation. For instance, a certain securities firm was forced to add a
related-party penetration check in its IPO sponsorship business, resulting in a 30% extension
of the project cycle.
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Meanwhile, compliance with
information disclosure has
become the "Sword of
Damocles" hanging over the
heads of listed companies.
Regulatory authorities require
the establishment of a
comprehensive management
system that covers data
collection, content review, and
risk warning. Any slight oversight could lead to class-action lawsuits triggered by
discrepancies in performance forecasts or omissions in ESG information. In 2025, a city
commercial bank once faced investor claims amounting to 230 million yuan due to a 48-hour
delay in disclosing the net value of its financial products.
More critically, compliance risks are propagating along the supply chain. Publicly listed
companies need to conduct thorough due diligence on suppliers, underwriters, and even
customers. A certain consumer finance company faced a three-month delay in its Hong Kong
stock listing hearing because it failed to promptly identify data violations by a partner
payment platform.
In terms of technology, the conflict between outdated core systems and the requirements of
digital regulation is particularly prominent. Some institutions still rely on manual spot checks
for anti-money laundering monitoring, making it difficult to achieve the real-time monitoring
required by the regulations. Meanwhile, the simultaneously implemented "Data Security
Management Measures for Banking and Insurance Institutions" has increased the
compliance cost of cross-border data transmission by 40%, forcing enterprises to strike a
difficult balance between local data deployment and global business expansion.
3. Corporate Response Strategies and Practical Recommendations
To address the aforementioned challenges, enterprises can develop compliance plans from
the following dimensions in accordance with the requirements of the
"Measures": Organizational and Institutional Optimization
Gap Analysis and Planning: Conduct a step-by-step evaluation of the existing system
against the "Measures," develop a phased rectification plan, and specify responsible
departments and timelines.
Structural Adjustment: Establish an independent compliance department to ensure that the
Chief Compliance Officer reports directly to the board of directors and is granted veto power
over major decisions.
The construction of a risk prevention and control mechanism.
Dynamic Risk Assessment: Establish a periodic compliance risk identification and warning
mechanism, with a focus on areas such as anti-money laundering, data security, and related
party transactions.
Emergency Plan: Develop rapid response procedures for sudden risks such as regulatory
inspections and litigation, to mitigate negative impacts.
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
The empowerment of technology and culture.
Digital Compliance Tools: Introduce compliance
management systems such as intelligent
compliance platforms to achieve automated risk
screening, process traceability, and report
generation, thereby enhancing efficiency.
Company-wide Compliance Culture: Strengthen
employees' recognition of the value of compliance
through case training, compliance assessments,
and incentive mechanisms.
External collaboration and resource integration.
Regulatory Communication: Actively participate in policy interpretation meetings, regularly
report remediation progress to regulatory authorities, and seek guidance and support.
Third-Party Services: Collaborate with professional compliance service organizations to
leverage external expertise to address internal resource gaps, such as compliance training,
system certification, etc.
The implementation of the "Measures for the Compliance Management of Financial
Institutions" is both a challenge and an opportunity for enterprises to build a long-term
compliance mechanism and enhance their core competitiveness. By systematically
optimizing management systems, strengthening technological empowerment, and fostering
cultural development, enterprises can not only meet regulatory requirements but also
establish a benchmark image of compliance in the capital market, laying a solid foundation
for sustainable development.
2 0 2 4 10月刊
C B I V I S I O N | 2025 MAR
Thanks for reading
HOTLINE
400 0806 099
marketing@chinacbi.com
www.chinacbi.com
CBI (Beijing) Business Information Limited