
65
indistinct boundaries.
While post-Marxist geography theorists such as David Harvey,
Henri Lefebvre, and Don Mitchell identify place as both the setting for social relations and
an entity that can be constructed to suit the needs of the market, this chapter is primarily
concerned with the ways people remake places to suit social needs rather than the economic
underpinnings of space and place.
The second half of place collecting is concerned with specific acts of accumulation
that constitute the practice of collecting. Scholars have written about collecting as a form
of consumption, as an obsession, or as a heroic and selfless act of love that saves
unappreciated material treasures for future generations.
Though collecting has
traditionally been examined as an institutional practice of museums and archives, an
increasing number of scholars in recent decades have acknowledged the importance of
what Paul Martin calls popular collecting. This is distinguished from the more “traditional,
rarefied world of antique or art collecting,” which he calls classical collecting.
Museums
have a long history of positioning themselves as arbiters of taste and class, distinguishing
For Tim Cresswell’s interpretation of Harvey vis-à-vis Massey, see Place: A Short Introduction (London:
Blackwell, 2004), chapter 3, “Reading ‘A Global Sense of Place.’” For the original theorists in their own
words, see “From Space to Place and Back Again” in David Harvey, Justice, Nature and the Geography of
Difference (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996) and Doreen Massey, Space, Place and Gender
(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994) 146-156.
For the implications of the different ways space is produced and reproduced, both physically and
metaphorically, see Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (Oxford:
Blackwell, 1991). A discussion of the often-overlooked dimension of human labor in producing space
appears in Don Mitchell, The Lie of the Land: Migrant Workers and the California Landscape
(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), chapter 1, “The Beautiful and the Damned.”
For a discussion of collecting as consumption, see Leah Dilworth, ed., Acts of Possession: Collecting in
America (New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2003) and Russell Belk, Collecting in a Consumer
Society (London: Routledge, 1995). Werner Muensterberger, Collecting: An Unruly Passion (New York:
Harvest, 1994) discusses collecting in terms of psychological obsession, as does more recent work on
hoarding, notably Randy Frost and Gail Steketee, Stuff: Compulsive Hoarding and the Meaning of Things
(Boston: Mariner Books, 2010). For the idea of collecting as saving unappreciated items, see the interview
with food packaging collector Robert Opie in John Elsner and Roger Cardinal, eds., The Cultures of
Collecting (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994), chapter 2.
Paul Martin, Popular Collecting and the Everyday Self: The Reinvention of Museums (London: Leicester
University Press, 1999). Martin advances the idea that collecting reinforces self-assurance and social
equilibrium in the face of destabilizing socio-economic forces.