
151
Proceedings of the 5th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, BalticSTE2023
This is an open access article under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License
Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast
between foods and medicines. Appetite, 43(2), 147-154.
Saatsi, J. (2019). What is theoretical progress of science? Synthese, 196, 611–631.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1118-9
Salmeron, L. (2013). Activities that promote transfer of learning: A
review of the literature. Revista De Educacion, Special Issue. 34-
53.
Nature
Geoscience, 4, 130–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1094
Developmental Science, 7(3), 308-324.
education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325-351.
Schumannhengsteler, R., & Thomas, J. (1994). What do children know about environmental-
protection. Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht, 41(4), 249-261.
Schwartz, D., L., Chase, C., C., & Bransford, J., D. (2012). Resisting overzealous transfer:
Coordinating previously successful routines with needs for new learning. Educational
Psychologist, 47(3), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.696317
education in science education. In Eilks I., & Hofstein A. (Eds.), Relevant chemistry
education: From theory to practice (pp. 335–354). Sense.
Weimann, B. J. (2002). Natural and synthetic substances related to human health. (IUPAC
Technical Report) Pure and Applied Chemistry, 74(10), 1957–1985.
knowledge and its place in the teaching system]. Pedagogika, 1, 7-16.
Venville, G. J., Louisell, R. D., & Wilhelm, J. A. (2012). Young children’s knowledge about
the moon: A complex dynamic system. Research in Science Education, 42, 729–752.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9220-y
BioEssays, 3, 1255–1262.
Nauka, 3, 131-151.
Received: March 30, 2023 Accepted: May 12, 2023
Cite as: (2023). The durability of formal
knowledge and its restructuring during lifelong learning. In V. Lamanauskas
(Ed.), Science and technology education: New developments and Innovations.
Proceedings of the 5th International Baltic Symposium on Science and
Technology Education (BalticSTE2023) (pp. 137-150). Scientia Socialis Press.
https://doi.org/10.33225/BalticSTE/2023.137
UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' OPINIONS
ON THE USE OF 3D HOLOGRAMS IN
LEARNING ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Stanislava Olić Ninković , Jasna Adamov
University of Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: stanislava.olic@dh.uns.ac.rs, jasna.adamov@dh.uns.ac.rs
Abstract
3D holograms are an eective tool for visualization, and their utilization in chemistry teaching
can be benecial in improving learning outcomes. However, studies on students’ opinions about
holograms in chemistry teaching and learning are scarce. The research aimed to examine the
views of chemistry students on the application of 3D holograms in organic chemistry learning at
the university level. In this cross-sectional study, 55 rst-year chemistry students at the University
of Novi Sad (Serbia) participated. The sample consisted of students aged 18-20, of which 85.5%
were female and 14.5% were male. An online questionnaire designed for this research was used
to collect quantitative data. Data obtained after an eight-week application of 3D holograms in
organic chemistry classes revealed that students have a positive opinion about the application of
3D holograms in organic chemistry classes. Therefore, the research results imply that teachers
should apply 3D holograms in chemistry classes.
Keywords: augmented reality, 3D holograms, chemistry education, students’ opinion
Introduction
social norms, and behaviors. Working with these students demands of educators a
change in the strategies and design of teaching and learning. Therefore, teachers are
constantly looking for new approaches to motivate and engage new generations
of students in learning. Technological development plays a very important role in
improving the educational process, which increased interest in the application of virtual
and augmented reality (Cheng & Tsai, 2013). The potential of augmented reality for
Shaharuddin, 2019), which is based on the use of a computer system or smartphone to
2021). The representation of images goes beyond the two-dimensional (2D) screen to
2022). This projection of virtual content is mediated by the aid of technological devices
and transparent surfaces.
Hologram technologies are applicable to a variety of industries (Yoo et al.,
2022). In recent years, the application of 3D holograms has become more popular
https://doi.org/10.33225/BalticSTE/2023.151