Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for Future Innovations PDF Free Download
1 / 10/10
100%
Author
Notification
19 February 2024
Final Revised
28 March 2024
Published
31 March 2024
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
■ 200
Copyright (c) 2024 Emilyani, Marviola Grace Hardini, Natasya Aprila Yusuf,
Achani Rahmania Az Zahra (Author) This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing the
Power of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for
Future Innovations
Emilyani1, Marviola Grace Hardini2, Natasya April Yusuf3, Achani Rahmania Az Zahra4
Rey Incorporation, United States1,
IJIIS Incorporation, Singapore2,
Faculty of Science of Technology, University of Raharja, Indonesia3,4
e-mail: emilyani@rey.zone, marviolagraceh@ijis.asia, natasya@raharja.info,
achani@raharja.info
To cite this document:
Emilyani, Grace Hardini, M., Aprila Yusuf, N., & Rahmania Az Zahra, A. (2024). Convergence
of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for
Future Innovations. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, 5(2), 200–209.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i2.1068
Abstract
This research aims to explore the convergence between smart networks, artificial
intelligence (AI), and blockchain technology as a foundation for future innovation. The
background includes the rapid development of information and communications technology,
which is driving increasing integration between AI and blockchain in infrastructure networks. The
methods used include a comprehensive literature survey and in-depth analysis of the latest
trends in the development of this technology. The issues examined include interoperability,
security, and privacy challenges faced in integrating AI and blockchain. The research results
show that this convergence promises to improve efficiency, transparency and transparency in a
variety of applications, from supply chain management to financial services. However,
significant challenges such as scalability and regulation must also be overcome to realize the
full potential of this convergence. In conclusion, the merger of AI and blockchain expands the
scope of technological innovation by leveraging the strengths of each, but more efforts are
needed to address further issues so that this convergence can be implemented widely and
sustainably in various industrial fields.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Innovation, Technology, Security
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 201
1. Introduction
in recent decades, information and communication technology has undergone rapid
development, fundamentally transforming various aspects of human life. One of the most
prominent current trends is the convergence between artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain
technologym[1]. AI, with its ability to process data quickly and intelligently, has changed the way
we work, interact, and make decisions. On the other hand, blockchain, with its principles of
decentralization and high security, has brought revolutionary potential in terms of data
transparency, reliability, and security[2].
However, this potential is also accompanied by several challenges that need to be
addressed[3]. The primary challenge is how to overcome interoperability between different AI
and blockchain systems, as well as ensuring the security and privacy of data processed and
stored in decentralized environments[4]. Additionally, considerations need to be made on how
to enhance the scalability of this technology to efficiently handle the ever-growing volume of
data Therefore, in-depth research is needed to further understand how to tackle these
challenges and realize the full potential of the convergence between AI and blockchain[5]. The
main objective of this research is to comprehensively investigate the convergence between AI
and blockchain and its implications in the context of future innovationx[6].
Through thorough analysis, this research aims to identify the main challenges in
integrating these two technologies and to develop appropriate strategies to address these
challenges. This paper also aims to provide valuable insights for readers into the potential
applications of the convergence between AI and blockchain in various industry sectors, as well
as its implications for social, economic, and political change[7]. Thus, this research is expected
to make a significant contribution in guiding future technological developments and preparing
society to face an era of increasingly complex and dynamic innovation[8].
2. Research Method
The research method employed utilizes SmartPLS analysis with 170 online respondents
and a 1-5 rating scale, designed with detailed steps. Initially, data collection will be conducted
online through a survey platform. Respondents will be randomly selected from a population
relevant to the research focus. The survey will be formatted with structured questions aimed at
obtaining respondents' perceptions and views regarding the convergence of artificial intelligence
(AI) and blockchain technology, as well as its impacts across various life domains.
Subsequently, the research variables will be carefully identified. The main variables will
encompass the degree of convergence between AI and blockchain, while supporting variables
will include aspects such as integration challenges, technology scalability, data security and
privacy, social, economic, and political implications, as well as perceptions of future innovations.
This variable grouping will provide a solid foundation for deeper analysis.
Data analysis will be conducted using SmartPLS software. Path regression methods
will be applied to test and understand the relationships among variables in the research model.
The collected data will be processed and statistically evaluated to determine construct validity
and reliability. This approach will offer a profound understanding of how the convergence of AI
and blockchain influences various aspects of life and future innovations.
Lastly, the findings from the analysis will be carefully interpreted. These results will be
used to formulate strong conclusions highlighting the implications of this research. Practical
recommendations will be provided based on these findings, aiming to guide practitioners,
policymakers, and researchers in the field of information and communication technology. Thus,
this research method will provide a valuable contribution to understanding and addressing the
complex challenges associated with the convergence of AI and blockchain in the future.
2.2 Literature Review
2.2.1 Integration Challenges and Future Innovation
Integrating new technologies and systems into existing infrastructures poses significant
challenges, but it also holds the key to future innovation. The relationship between integration
challenges and future innovation is intricate and dynamic[9]. Firstly, as organizations seek to
incorporate cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence, Internet of Things (IoT), and
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 202
blockchain, they often encounter compatibility issues with legacy systems[10]. These challenges
can lead to delays, increased costs, and operational disruptions. However, overcoming these
integration hurdles fosters innovation by pushing companies to develop novel solutions and
adapt their processes to meet modern demands[11].
Navigating integration challenges requires collaboration and interdisciplinary
approaches. Teams must work together to bridge the gap between different technologies and
systems, fostering cross-functional expertise and knowledge sharing[12]. This collaboration not
only facilitates smoother integration but also sparks creativity and idea generation, laying the
groundwork for future innovations. By fostering a culture of collaboration and learning,
organizations can leverage integration challenges as catalysts for innovation[13].
Moreover, overcoming integration challenges often results in streamlined processes
and enhanced efficiency. As systems become more interconnected and interoperable, data
flows more seamlessly across the organization, enabling better decision-making and resource
optimization. These efficiency gains create space for experimentation and investment in new
technologies, driving continuous innovation. Organizations that successfully navigate
integration challenges are better positioned to adapt to changing market dynamics and
capitalize on emerging opportunities[14].
the relationship between integration challenges and future innovation is symbiotic.
While integration hurdles can be formidable, they also serve as springboards for innovation,
fostering collaboration, efficiency, and adaptability within organizations[15]. By embracing these
challenges and leveraging them as opportunities for growth, businesses can pave the way for
future advancements and maintain a competitive edge in an increasingly dynamic
landscape[16].
2.2.2 Security and Integration Challenges
The relationship between security and integration challenges creates a complex
dynamic in the modern world of information technology and business. Firstly, a primary
challenge in integrating new technologies is ensuring that the integrated systems remain secure
from cyber threats. System updates, interoperability, and architectural changes can increase
vulnerabilities to cyber attacks, necessitating sophisticated security strategies and well-
integrated solutions[17].
Secondly, the integration process often involves the transfer of sensitive and critical
data between various platforms or systems. Security challenges arise when this data must be
protected during transit and while residing in new repositories. Proper data protection is required
to prevent information leaks or privacy breaches, requiring organizations to develop strict
security policies and implement strong encryption[18].
there is often a tension between prioritizing security and accelerating the integration
process. Efforts to secure every aspect of integration can slow down the implementation of new
technology, while emphasizing speed can increase security risks. Therefore, organizations need
to find the right balance between speed and security, integrating security controls without
sacrificing operational efficiency[19].
security and integration challenges often require cross-departmental cooperation and
expertise from various fields. Information security teams, software developers, and system
administrators must work closely together to identify and address security risks associated with
integration[20]. Effective collaboration among involved stakeholders is key to addressing
security and integration challenges effectively, ensuring that companies can reap the full
benefits of technological innovation without compromising their information security[4]VV.
2.2.3 Security and Integration Challenges
In the era of intelligent network convergence, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) and
Blockchain combine their strengths to create future innovations, the relationship between
security and technology scalability plays a pivotal role[21]. Firstly, security emerges as a key
element because AI and Blockchain often handle sensitive and critical data. With the increasing
adoption of AI and Blockchain in intelligent networks, it is crucial to ensure that proper security
measures have been implemented to protect the integrity of data from cyber attacks[22].
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 203
Technology scalability becomes significantly important in accommodating the growth
and changes within intelligent networks[23]. However, the challenge arises in ensuring that as
the network expands, security remains intact. Scalable security solutions become vital in this
context, where systems should be able to grow with demand without compromising the security
of sensitive data[24].
Furthermore, in facing the convergence of AI and Blockchain, scalability also involves
the technology's ability to handle increasingly large volumes of data over time. In this regard,
good scalability must be balanced with effective security measures to keep data optimally
protected from cyber threats while maintaining high network performance[25].
Amid efforts to harness the power of AI and Blockchain for future innovations, it is
important to remember that the successful implementation of these technologies also depends
on how companies can address security and scalability challenges in a balanced manner. By
paying attention to the close relationship between security and technology scalability,
organizations can create a secure and scalable environment, enabling the development of more
innovative and robust intelligent networks in the future[26].
2.2.4 Technology Scalability and Future Innovation
In the paradigm of the convergence of intelligent networks, the relationship between
technology scalability and future innovation emerges as a crucial factor driving progress. Firstly,
technology scalability refers to the ability of a system or technology to handle increasing volumes
of data, users, or transactions without significant degradation in performance. As intelligent
networks continue to evolve and expand, scalability becomes paramount to accommodate the
growing demands of users and emerging technologies[27].
Technology scalability lays the foundation for future innovation by providing a flexible
and adaptable infrastructure. Scalable technologies can easily incorporate new features,
functionalities, and enhancements, enabling organizations to stay ahead of the curve in a rapidly
changing technological landscape. By fostering an environment conducive to experimentation
and growth, scalability fuels the exploration of novel ideas and the development of innovative
solutions.
The scalability of technology is closely intertwined with the concept of future-proofing.
As organizations invest in scalable technologies, they are better equipped to adapt to
unforeseen challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities[28]. Scalability enables
organizations to future-proof their systems by ensuring they can evolve and adapt in response
to evolving business needs, market dynamics, and technological advancements.
In conclusion, the relationship between technology scalability and future innovation is
symbiotic, with each reinforcing the other in the quest for progress. As intelligent networks
harness the power of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain, scalability becomes a cornerstone
for unlocking the full potential of these technologies and driving future innovations. By prioritizing
scalability and embracing its role as a catalyst for innovation, organizations can position
themselves at the forefront of technological advancement and pave the way for a more
innovative and resilient future.
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 204
3. Findings
Figure 1. Conceptual Model
Tabel 1. Reliability and Convergent Validity
Cronbach's
alpha
Composite
reliability
(rho_a)
Composite
reliability
(rho_c)
Average
variance
extracted (AVE)
Future Innovation
0.868
0.870
0.919
0.791
Integration Challenges
0.879
0.886
0.925
0.805
Security
0.818
0.824
0.891
0.732
Technology Scalability
0.887
0.894
0.930
0.815
In the results of Reliability and Convergent Validity calculation using the SmartPLS
method, several metrics are employed to evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the
measurement variables utilized in the research model. Firstly, Cronbach's alpha values are
utilized to measure the internal consistency reliability of each construct. A high alpha value
indicates that the items within the construct are consistent and reliable.
From the calculations, Integration Challenges exhibit the highest Cronbach's alpha
value of 0.879, signifying a good level of reliability in measuring that construct. Composite
Reliability (rho_a) and Composite Reliability (rho_c) are utilized to gauge the construct reliability
from different perspectives. Both metrics share similar interpretations with Cronbach's alpha,
where higher values indicate better reliability. From the calculations, the Technology Scalability
construct has the highest Composite Reliability (rho_a) and Composite Reliability (rho_c) values
of 0.887 and 0.894 respectively, indicating high reliability in measuring that construct.
Average Variance Extracted (AVE) is utilized to measure the convergent validity of a
construct, i.e., how well the construct can explain the variance of the measurement items. Higher
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 205
AVE values suggest better convergent validity. From the calculations, the Future Innovation
construct exhibits the highest AVE value of 0.791, indicating good convergent validity for that
construct.
The most influential variable in these calculations can be determined based on the
metric values provided. In this case, the Technology Scalability construct shows significant
influence, with high reliability and convergent validity values. Therefore, this construct can be
considered the most influential variable in the research model.
Overall, it can be concluded that all constructs demonstrate sufficiently high levels of
reliability and convergent validity, with metric values generally meeting the required standards
in academic research. However, it is important to consider interpreting these results in
conjunction with the research context and specific measurement objectives. Thus, these results
indicate that the measurement of variables in the research model is reliable and valid for further
analysis.
Tabel 2. Fornell-Larcker Discriminant Validity
Future
Innovation
Integration
Challenges
Security
Technology
Scalability
Future Innovation
0.890
Integration Challenges
0.860
0.897
Security
0.862
0.810
0.856
Technology Scalability
0.798
0.681
0.771
0.903
In the results of the Fornell-Larcker Discriminant Validity calculation using SmartPLS,
the focus is on assessing whether the constructs in the research model are sufficiently distinct
from each other. This is crucial to ensure that the measurement variables are indeed capturing
unique aspects of the constructs they are intended to represent. The Fornell-Larcker criterion
compares the square root of the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) for each construct with the
correlations between that construct and other constructs in the model.
From the provided correlations and AVE values, it is evident that the diagonal elements
(square roots of AVE) for each construct are higher than the off-diagonal elements (correlations
with other constructs). This indicates that the constructs exhibit discriminant validity, as each
construct explains more variance within itself than it shares with other constructs.
For instance, considering the Future Innovation construct, its AVE value is 0.890. When
compared with the correlations between Future Innovation and other constructs (0.860, 0.862,
and 0.798), it is clear that the diagonal value (0.890) is higher than all the correlations. This
confirms that Future Innovation has discriminant validity, meaning it is distinct from other
constructs in the model.
Similarly, Integration Challenges also demonstrate discriminant validity, as its diagonal
value (0.897) exceeds the correlations with other constructs (0.860, 0.810, and 0.681). Security
and Technology Scalability constructs also exhibit discriminant validity based on the same
comparison.
Among the constructs, Technology Scalability appears to have the most pronounced
discriminant validity, with its diagonal value (0.903) being substantially higher than its
correlations with other constructs (0.798, 0.681, and 0.771). This suggests that Technology
Scalability is highly distinct from the other constructs in the research model.
In summary, the Fornell-Larcker Discriminant Validity analysis confirms that the
constructs in the research model are sufficiently distinct from each other, as indicated by the
higher diagonal values (square roots of AVE) compared to the correlations with other constructs.
This ensures that the measurement variables effectively capture unique aspects of their
respective constructs, thereby enhancing the validity of the research findings.
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 206
Tabel 3. R-Square
R-square
Future Innovation
0.824
Integration Challenges
0.656
Technology Scalability
0.595
The provided R-Square table displays the results of the coefficient of determination (R-
square) calculations for three variables in the observed model: Future Innovation, Integration
Challenges, and Technology Scalability. R-square indicates the extent to which the variance in
the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables in the regression model.
Specifically, the R-square value for Future Innovation is 0.824, for Integration Challenges is
0.656, and for Technology Scalability is 0.595.
From these values, it can be inferred that Future Innovation has the most significant
impact on the dependent variable in the observed model. This is evidenced by the high R-square
value of 0.824, indicating that approximately 82.4% of the variance in the dependent variable
can be explained by Future Innovation. This variable may exert a strong influence on the
outcomes or performance observed in the context of future innovation.
Furthermore, Integration Challenges have a relatively significant impact, although not
as pronounced as Future Innovation, with an R-square value of 0.656. This suggests that
approximately 65.6% of the variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the
integration challenges that may be encountered. This variable may refer to barriers or difficulties
associated with integrating or harmonizing various elements within a system or process.
Meanwhile, Technology Scalability has a lower influence compared to the previous two
variables, with an R-square value of 0.595. This indicates that approximately 59.5% of the
variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the observed technology scalability.
This variable may be related to a technology's ability to grow or adapt to increasing demands.
Although it has a significant impact, technology scalability is not as strong as Future Innovation
in explaining the variance in the observed outcomes.
Tabel 4. Hypothesis Testing
Original
sample
(O)
Sample
mean
(M)
Standard
deviation
(STDEV)
T statistics
(|O/STDEV|)
P values
Integration Challenges ->
Future Innovation
0.589
0.591
0.059
9.973
0.000
Security -> Integration
Challenges
0.810
0.809
0.050
16.293
0.000
Security -> Technology
Scalability
0.771
0.771
0.055
14.015
0.000
Technology Scalability ->
Future Innovation
0.397
0.395
0.068
5.814
0.000
The table provided presents the results of hypothesis testing using SmartPLS. Each
row corresponds to a specific hypothesis being tested, along with relevant statistics such as
original sample (O), sample mean (M), standard deviation (STDEV), T statistics (|O/STDEV|),
and P-values. Starting with the first hypothesis tested, "Integration Challenges -> Future
Innovation," the original sample coefficient is 0.589. This indicates the strength and direction of
the relationship between Integration Challenges and Future Innovation. The T statistics,
calculated by dividing the original sample coefficient by the standard deviation, is 9.973. The
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 207
resulting P-value is 0.000, suggesting that the relationship between Integration Challenges and
Future Innovation is statistically significant. Therefore, Integration Challenges significantly
influence Future Innovation.
Moving to the second hypothesis, "Security -> Integration Challenges," the original
sample coefficient is 0.810, indicating a strong positive relationship between Security and
Integration Challenges. The T statistics is 16.293, with a P-value of 0.000, indicating statistical
significance. This suggests that Security has a significant impact on Integration Challenges.
Similarly, in the third hypothesis, "Security -> Technology Scalability," the original sample
coefficient is 0.771, with a high T statistics of 14.015 and a P-value of 0.000, indicating that the
relationship between Security and Technology Scalability is statistically significant. Security
significantly influences Technology Scalability.
Lastly, the fourth hypothesis, "Technology Scalability -> Future Innovation," shows an
original sample coefficient of 0.397. The T statistics is 5.814, with a P-value of 0.000, indicating
that the relationship between Technology Scalability and Future Innovation is statistically
significant. However, compared to other relationships tested, Technology Scalability's impact on
Future Innovation appears to be relatively weaker.
In summary, among the tested relationships, Security appears to have the most
significant influence as it demonstrates strong and statistically significant relationships with both
Integration Challenges and Technology Scalability. These findings provide insights into the
dynamics between the studied variables and emphasize the importance of Security in
influencing Integration Challenges and Technology Scalability, which in turn affect Future
Innovation.
4. Conclusion
This research delves into exploring the convergence between smart networks, artificial
intelligence (AI), and blockchain technology, aiming to lay the groundwork for future innovation.
With the rapid advancements in information and communication technology, there's a growing
integration between AI and blockchain within infrastructure networks, promising enhanced
efficiency, transparency, and security across various applications. However, challenges like
interoperability and scalability need addressing to fully realize the potential of this convergence.
The study concludes that while merging AI and blockchain broadens the scope of technological
innovation, concerted efforts are necessary to tackle the associated challenges for widespread
and sustainable implementation across industrial sectors.
The implications of this research are significant, underscoring the importance of
understanding and addressing integration challenges between AI and blockchain for future
technological innovation. By strengthening our understanding of this convergence,
stakeholders including practitioners, policymakers, and researchers can better prepare for the
increasingly complex landscape of technological innovation.
For further research, it's crucial to continue exploring the dynamics of convergence
between AI and blockchain and its implications for future innovation. Additionally, deeper
research is needed on overcoming integration challenges, particularly regarding
interoperability, scalability, and data security. With a better understanding of these issues, more
effective strategies may emerge to leverage the full potential of the convergence between AI
and blockchain in technological innovation contexts.
The SmartPLS analysis provides valuable insights into the reliability and validity of the
research model. The results indicate that all constructs demonstrate high levels of reliability
and convergent validity, meeting the standards required for academic research. Notably, the
Technology Scalability construct emerges as the most influential variable, with high reliability
and convergent validity values. Therefore, future research should delve deeper into
understanding how technology scalability influences future innovation and address associated
challenges effectively.
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 208
References
[1] N. Anantrasirichai and D. Bull, Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review,
vol. 55, no. 1. Springer Netherlands, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7.
[2] H. Ko, S. Lee, Y. Park, and A. Choi, “A Survey of Recommendation Systems:
Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields,” Electron., vol. 11, no. 1,
2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11010141.
[3] B. P. Setiawan and M. Zaki, “Landslide Management for Batu Tulis–Cross Bogor–
Sukabumi Station Double Lane Project at STA 5+ 550,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no.
2, pp. 168–180, 2024.
[4] R. Heriyanto, T. Mariyanti, and A. R. A. Zahra, “Microfinance Management Strategy
Using Poverty Reduction Technology,” in 2023 11th International Conference on Cyber
and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2023, pp. 1–5.
[5] D. S. S. Wuisan, R. A. Sunardjo, Q. Aini, N. A. Yusuf, and U. Rahardja, “Integrating
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management: A SmartPLS Approach for
Entrepreneurial Success,” Aptisi Trans. Technopreneursh., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 334–345,
2023.
[6] E. A. Beldiq, B. Callula, N. A. Yusuf, and A. R. A. Zahra, “Unlocking Organizational
Potential: Assessing the Impact of Technology through SmartPLS in Advancing
Management Excellence,” APTISI Trans. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2024.
[7] A. R. A. Zahra, D. Jonas, I. Erliyani, and N. A. Yusuf, “Assessing Customer Satisfaction
in AI-Powered Services: An Empirical Study with SmartPLS,” Int. Trans. Artif. Intell., vol.
2, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 2023.
[8] I. Handayani, D. Apriani, M. Mulyati, A. R. A. Zahra, and N. A. Yusuf, “Enhancing Security
and Privacy of Patient Data in Healthcare: A SmartPLS Analysis of Blockchain
Technology Implementation,” IAIC Trans. Sustain. Digit. Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–17,
2023.
[9] I. Handayani, D. Apriani, M. Mulyati, N. A. Yusuf, and A. R. A. Zahra, “A Survey on User
Experience of Blockchain Transactions: Security and Adaptability Issues,” Blockchain
Front. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 160–168, 2023.
[10] Y. Duan, J. S. Edwards, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Artificial intelligence for decision making in
the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol.
48, pp. 63–71, 2019.
[11] R. Sawhney, A. Malik, S. Sharma, and V. Narayan, “A comparative assessment of
artificial intelligence models used for early prediction and evaluation of chronic kidney
disease,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 6, p. 100169, 2023.
[12] M. G. Jacobides, S. Brusoni, and F. Candelon, “The evolutionary dynamics of the
artificial intelligence ecosystem,” Strateg. Sci., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 412–435, 2021.
[13] Z. Wang, M. Li, J. Lu, and X. Cheng, “Business Innovation based on artificial intelligence
and Blockchain technology,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 59, no. 1, p. 102759, 2022.
[14] D. Jonas, N. A. Yusuf, and A. R. A. Zahra, “Enhancing Security Frameworks with Artificial
Intelligence in Cybersecurity,” Int. Trans. Educ. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 83–91, 2023.
[15] S. Kosasi, C. Lukita, M. H. R. Chakim, A. Faturahman, and D. A. R. Kusumawardhani,
“The Influence of Digital Artificial Intelligence Technology on Quality of Life with a Global
Perspective,” Aptisi Trans. Technopreneursh., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 240–250, 2023.
[16] L. Balyen and T. Peto, “Promising artificial intelligence-machine learning-deep learning
algorithms in ophthalmology,” Asia-Pacific J. Ophthalmol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 264–272,
2019.
[17] S.-L. Wamba-Taguimdje, S. Fosso Wamba, J. R. Kala Kamdjoug, and C. E.
Tchatchouang Wanko, “Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the
business value of AI-based transformation projects,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 26,
no. 7, pp. 1893–1924, 2020.
[18] X. Lin, R. Z. Wu, Y. T. Lim, J. Han, and S. C. Chen, “Understanding the sustainable
usage intention of mobile payment technology in Korea: Cross-countries comparison of
Chinese and Korean users,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 1–23, 2019, doi:
10.3390/su11195532.
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) p-ISSN : 2685-9106
Vol. 5 No. 2 March 2023 e-ISSN : 2686-0384
Convergence of Intelligent Networks: Harnessing… ■ 209
[19] A. Pambudi, N. Lutfiani, M. Hardini, A. R. A. Zahra, and U. Rahardja, “The Digital
Revolution of Startup Matchmaking: AI and Computer Science Synergies,” in 2023
Eighth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 2023, pp. 1–6.
[20] Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging
challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf.
Manage., vol. 57, p. 101994, 2021.
[21] A. S. George, “Securing the Future of Finance: How AI, Blockchain, and Machine
Learning Safeguard Emerging Neobank Technology Against Evolving Cyber Threats,”
Partners Univers. Innov. Res. Publ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 2023.
[22] S. K. Hassan and A. Ibrahim, “The role of Artificial Intelligence in Cyber Security and
Incident Response,” Int. J. Electron. Crime Investig., vol. 7, no. 2, 2023.
[23] R. D’Hauwers, J. Van Der Bank, and M. Montakhabi, “Trust, transparency and security
in the sharing economy: What is the Government’s role?,” Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev.,
vol. 10, no. 5, 2020.
[24] N. Kaloudi and J. Li, “The ai-based cyber threat landscape: A survey,” ACM Comput.
Surv., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2020.
[25] S. Kumar, U. Gupta, A. K. Singh, and A. K. Singh, “Artificial Intelligence: Revolutionizing
cyber security in the Digital Era,” J. Comput. Mech. Manag., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 31–42,
2023.
[26] T. Hariguna, Y. Durachman, M. Yusup, and S. Millah, “Blockchain technology
transformation in advancing future change,” Blockchain Front. Technol., vol. 1, no. 01,
pp. 13–20, 2021.
[27] B. Domini, A. S. Dewi, and G. P. Cesna, “The Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on
Company Performance Including the Value of AI-based Business Transformation
Initiatives,” IAIC Trans. Sustain. Digit. Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 2023.
[28] E. Sulistyaningsih, W. Murti, and C. Ratnasih, “Analysis of E-Marketing Strategy and
Business Innovation in Optimizing Improvement of Service Quality and Its Effect on
MSME Income,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155–167, 2024.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
