
who are part of the armies, who go to fight other men, who wait in terror in
the trenches for the assault of the enemy, or leave them to kill their equally
terrified enemies, or ride their horses in the mad frenzy of a cavalry charge,
or are shot down from their planes during a bombardment by an anti-aircraft
battery manned also by other men. If we think of the many stories of war in
any format that we have been told, and with very few exceptions such as the
presence of women in the Red Army in World War II, we will only remember
the presence of men and their heroic deeds, their cowardice, misery, bravery,
etc., alone or in a group with other men.
But, undoubtedly, this is a version that clearly falsifies the reality of things.
Because if History is, so to speak, a huge canvas, what is shown in those stories
is only a part of that canvas, and, in that sense, it is true that there are no women
in that section of the image. But if only we shift our gaze a little towards the
margins of the canvas, or towards less illuminated parts of the canvas, then
we will begin to perceive that indeed women have been there all along, and
that the problem was not that they were not there but that we were simply
incapable of seeing them. Or even worse, we didn’t want to see them. Or even
worse than that, we weren’t allowed to see them. Frequently, the writing of
History works the way science does, with a strategy of trial and error, so that
we could also say that History, at least serious History, is a story that far from
attempting to write and define once and for all what happened in the past, it
struggles to rewrite itself, precisely because of its bad conscience, that is, because
it is (unconsciously) aware that its writing generates dark areas, because telling
implies being silent, because emitting is omitting. Inevitably.
And when those dark areas are illuminated then we can see how women also
have a close relationship with war. The women who in modern times occupy
the factories and maintain the machinery of war in substitution of the men
who had to march to the front, and the women who also participate, in one
way or another, in the various aspects of war, an activity that does not restrict
itself to the battlefield or the fight at the decisive moment. And also, like other
segments of the population, the women who are frequently collateral victims
of the consequences of war, both because they have to suffer the shortage of
resources in the rearguard and/or because they are often victims themselves
of the violence that any war generates, not the least of that violence being the
more than frequent possibility of ending up as a plunder of war, in the usual
form of a sexual assault, or as a trophy within the reach of a victorious soldier.
In this section of our collection we include three essays which only by chance
happen to coincide in their focus and in the chronological order of their analysis:
the situation of women in the period from the end of the First World War to
19I want my money back