
133
dominance, which was already mentioned above, these include assertiveness, success and achievement
orientation, determination, confidence, self-reliance, independence, risk-taking, aggression, violence,
toughness, emotional flatness, and competitiveness. For many of the experts in the field the crucial
aspect of male identity is sexuality. Specifically, the stereotypical perspective sees a real man as
heterosexual, sexually very active, and competent.
Soldier masculinity
According to Goldstein, the embodiment of masculinity is a warrior, in fact, he uses the description
“a central component of manhood” (58). Although Higate and Hopton state that an image of a real man
as a fighter, warrior or soldier is often presented not only by popular culture, i.e., in movies and TV shows,
but also by academics, for instance, by historians, there is a lack of attention given to the topic theoretically.
They claim that scholars neglect the gender, specifically masculinity, dimension of war and the army (432).
Goldstein criticizes the fact that the few writers dealing with masculinity rarely pay any attention to war
or to the connection between war and masculinity and their works often do not include such terms as
army, military, weapons, war, fight, etc. (14). Such neglect is surprising not only because, as Morgan states,
war and the military are some of the areas most obviously connected with masculinity construction (165)
but, more importantly, when the impacts and dangers of such influence are taken into consideration.
A warrior masculinity, just like masculinity in general, is enforced on men from their early childhood.
Cultures and societies use all kinds of means in order to create male soldiers and warriors. For instance,
Carlsson-Paige and Levin describe how teachers and parents often apprehensively observe boys
engaging in war play. According to them, parents claim it is not possible to “turn on television, visit other
children, or go to a supermarket, toy store, or playground with their children without encountering some
reminder of war and weapons play” (qtd. in Goldstein 296). They also explain that war characters are so
attractive for boys because they are “clearly defined male models with which to identify” (qtd. in Goldstein
298). Dawson draws attention to the fact that boys are traditionally motivated to play with toy guns and
other military equipment, toy tanks, warplanes, ships, and last but not least solder figures (qtd. in Higate
and Hopton 434) most famous even nowadays, of course, being G. I. Joe.
The enforcement, of course, continues through men’s adolescence and adulthood. As Goldstein
describes, “cultures mold males into warriors by attaching to ‘manhood’ or ‘masculinity’ those qualities
that make good warriors” (252), such as toughness, aggressiveness, physical strength, confidence,
independence, bravery, endurance, and ability to be emotionally detached, even ruthless or merciless.
Such enforcement can be seen as a typical use of some biological tendencies among members of a given
gender to determine requirements on the whole group. It is important to mention that some of the
abovementioned qualities are not, in fact, very useful in some of the contemporary wars as they are
fought in the way that does not require the soldiers to be physically strong or even in great physical
condition due to technological development which enables soldiers to fight over great distance.
The binary division mentioned in the previous part is crucial also for the soldier’s masculinity.
Interestingly, there are three groups that real men can be defined in contrast to, and which are used as
a tool to shame men into joining the army. These are, obviously, women, however, it is important to
mention that even some groups of men are perceived as opposing and at the same time subordinate
to the warrior masculinity, i.e., homosexual men, and pacifist men, who are also presented as effeminate.
As Phillips describes, “societies which arbitrarily label a number of purely human traits ‘feminine’ possess
a tactic useful to war-making, for men are bound to detect some of these human traits in themselves–and
then worry that they have strayed into a feminine inferior realm” and if, in addition, “the society also