
Chapter 2: Property Type Outlook
Emerging Trends in Real Estate® 202653
Next Best
After years of elevated vacancy and costly renancings
amid higher interest rates, many landlords do not have the
deep pockets to reposition their buildings, and a dearth of
new construction over the past few years means that large
blocks of trophy-caliber space are no longer available. (The
president’s July 2025 tax bill that made qualied tenant
improvements 100 percent deductible may help improve
some second-generation buildings, however.) Instead, many
B quality buildings are suddenly nding themselves attractive
to occupiers who would otherwise opt for higher quality
space. Given the nancial challenges for developers post-
COVID, just over 27 million square feet of space are under
construction according to JLL—matching the lowest levels of
new supply since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC). Employers
who anticipate any headcount growth in the next few years
cannot depend on a stream of new trophy quality deliveries
to meet demand, which is one reason space that was
described by one broker as “best of the rest” is performing
well, particularly against the backdrop of declining sublease
space. This concern was echoed in CBRE’s occupier
trends survey ndings, where nearly half of all respondents
expressed concern about the availability of good-quality,
well-located space, despite historically high vacancy rates.
Rather than a split between trophy versus all other space,
there’s been a trickle-down effect where tenants are opting
for space that is “next best.” Even without the luxury hotel–
caliber amenities, however, one emerging shift is the desire
for ex space. Taking a page from pre-pandemic co-working
providers, landlords are now offering shared workspaces
directly to their building tenants. From large conference
rooms with catering options to overow space for individual
work (albeit in a group setting), these space options have
been key in attracting tenants—enabling them to access
more space on an as-needed basis, rather than paying for
extra space that may be infrequently used.
Recalibration Ahead
The ofce market has clearly turned a corner, but the path
ahead won’t be linear. While vacancy rates have continued to
climb, one reason that the outlook is likely to improve is due
to base effects: nearly empty buildings are being removed
from inventory due to obsolescence. A leasing director for a
major ofce landlord referred to these buildings as “zombies”
and noted that, in many cases, it would be more cost-
effective to tear down the building and rebuild from scratch
instead of repositioning the existing structure. Lenders,
too, may prefer buildings with the “lights out.” Given the
operating complexities of ofce high-rises, one capital
markets broker commented that building management and
lease-up by lenders were “never the business model . . . so
it’s much easier to let the building go ‘zombie’ and then trade
it.”
This tacit acknowledgement—that time may not heal all
“wounded” buildings—is a positive sign for the sector’s
recovery, but looking ahead, implies that vacancy rates have
further room to rise. Municipalities have begun to focus on
innovative programs that incentivize ofce-to-residential
conversion (conversions in Chicago’s LaSalle Corridor are
one notable example) but economic aid to offset elevated
construction and nancing costs is only one part of the
equation. One broker pointed to the need for “massive
rezonings,” which could be a lifeline for underperforming
assets—particularly those not located proximate to transit
hubs. “People will live in places they will not work,” said
the broker, commenting that transit access remains key for
employees, the large majority of whom commute.
Despite predictions that the “hub-and-spoke model” for
ofce—a larger CBD ofce surrounded by smaller, suburban
satellite ofces—would accelerate in the wake of COVID as
employees moved further away from the workplace, such
forecasts have failed to materialize. As one research head
noted, the centrally located ofce that’s “equally inconvenient
for everybody” still prevails.
Nonetheless, suburban ofces seem to be in a stronger
position than their urban counterparts. Occupied stock, on
an indexed basis, was at to modestly higher for suburban
ofces of both class A and class B/C between Q1 2021 and
Q2 2025 while CBD ofce occupancies contracted over the
same period. Reecting the greater weakness of the urban
ofce market, post-COVID price levels (which hit a low only in
Q1 2025),saw a 50-percent peak-to-trough price decline for
CBD ofce assets versus just 19 percent for suburban ofce
assets, in contrast to the price performance of ofce during
the GFC, where prices for urban and suburban ofce space
fell by approximately the same amount (38 and 41 percent,
respectively). As Cushman & Wakeeld points out, the much
larger pipeline of new ofce construction underway in CBDs
versus suburban areas early in the pandemic combined
with greater space shedding by larger rms in CBDs during
the pandemic means that CBD vacancy rates will come
down more slowly than suburban vacancy for several more
quarters.