
Accelerometry & Sit-to-Stand
longest between t3-t4, while extension is completed and
settling takes place.
DISCUSSIONEach method of measurement of sit-to-stand
provides useful information. Force plates have been
more commonly used in studies of sit-to-stand. The force
plate measures ground reaction forces at the feet, from
which motions of the body are deduced. Accelerometry
data is in the form of motion patterns that depend on the
location of accelerometers on the subject. Our sensors
were placed on each side of the waist, near the body's
center of gravity.
The force and accelerometry traces in the
vertical (Z) direction possess similarities in shape,
containing a small negative peak, then a positive peak,
and then one more negative peak. They would be even
more similar if the subject's chair was also on the force
plate, starting and ending with all weight on the force
plates. In the X direction (anterior-posterior), the force
and accelerometry traces do not appear to be similar.
Their peaks are in the opposite direction from one
another, and of different proportion to their respective Z
traces. This'is associated with the fact that the body
accelerometric sensors are tilted as the subject flexes the
upper body. forward. Therefore, the accelerometric traces
do not represent accelerations relative to a fixed set of
axes relative to the ground, as is the case with force
plates. Instead, the axes move with the sensors. Because
of this, the time intervals containing extension are very
apparent on the B-X trace as a steep increase in
acceleration.In both cases, the Z and X sets of data provide
more information than Y, as expected, since most
motions occur in these planes. There was little side-to-
side motion in any of our healthy young subjects during
the performance of sit-to-stand in both accelerometric
and force plate data.
The start of sit-to-stand motion was more
apparent in F-Z data from force plates, while it was more
apparent in the B-X accelerometry data.
The difference in times as compared to that
reported by Kralj, et al. may have been due to a number
of factors. For example, Kralj, et al. used only one force
plate, having the chair and subject on the force plate. In
our study, the chair was off of the force plates, while the
subject was asked to perform sit-to-stand with one foot
on each of two force plates. The forces from both plates
were summed. This could have contributed to
differences in peak-to-peak values used to mark time
intervals. In addition, all subjects in our study were
young (24-33 yrs.), while the age group ranged between
24 and 51 years of age in the study by Kralj, et al.
CONCLUSION
Since Newton's second law relates force and
acceleration, it should be possible to estimate force using
the acceleration data collected if the masses of segments
in motion are known. Ground reaction forces obtained
by force plates can be compared to calculated forces
using accelerometry data, after compensation for effects
from tilt. Data from a larger number of subjects now
under study should clarify the relationship between force
plate and accelerometric data in the study of sit-to-stand.
There is potential for acceleration to be used as a
supplement or alternative to force plate data.
REFERENCES
(1) Millington, P.J., B.M. Myklebust, G.M. Shambes.
"Biomechanical analysis of the Sit-to-Stand Motion in
Elderly, Persons." Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation 73(July 1992): 609-617.
(2) Riley, P.O. M.L. Schenkman, R.W. Mann, W.A. Hodge.
"Mechanics of a Constrained Chair-Rise. " Journal of
Biomechanics. 24, no. 1 (1991): 77-85.
Kralj, A, R.J. Jaeger, J. Munih. "Analysis of Standing Up
and Sitting Down in Humans: Definitions and Normative
Data Presentation." Journal of Biomechanics. 23, no. 11
(1990): 1123-1138.
(4) Sabelman, E.E., J.J. Gadd, D.E. Kenney, P.M. Merritt,
C.H. Winograd. "Balance Diagnosis Using a Wearable
Upper Body Motion Analysis Computer." Proc. To
RESNA International 1992: 81-83.
Engardt, M., E. Olsson. "Body Weight-Bearing While
Rising and Sitting Down in Patients with Stroke. Scand
J Rehab Med. 24 (1992): 67-74.
(6) Engardt, M., T. Ribbe, E. Olsson. "Vertical Ground
Reaction Force Feedback to Enhance Stroke Patients'
Symmetrical Body-Weight Distribution While
Rising/Sitting Down." Scand J Rehab Med. 25(1993):
41-48.
Hanke, T.A., Y.C. Pai, M.W. Rogers. "Reliability of
Measurements of Body Center-of-Mass Momentum
During Sit-to-Stand in Healthy Adults." Phys Ther
75(1995): 105-118.
Hesse, S., M. Schauer, M. Malezic, M. Jahnke, K.H.
Mauritz. "Quantitative Analysis of Rising From a Chair
in Healthy and Hemiparetic Subjects." Scand J Rehab
Med. 26(1994): 161-166.
Stevens, C. F. Bojsen-Moller, R.W. Soames. "The
Influence of Initial Posture on the Sit-to-Stand
Movement." Eur J Appl Physiol 58(1989): 687-692.
(10) Yoshida, K, H. Iwakura, F. Inoue. "Motion Analysis In
the Movements of Standing Up From and Sitting Down on
a Chair. A Comparison of Normal and Hemiparetic
Subjects and the Differences of Sex and Age Among the
Normals." Scand J Rehab Med. 15(1983): 133-140.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Supported by VA Rehabilitation R&D Merit Review project
E601-2RA.
(3)
(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)
VA Rehabilitation R&D Center, 3801 Miranda Ave., #153,
Palo Alto, CA 94304
62 RESNA '98 June 26 - 30, 1998