
193
class with forty per cent SEN children, some of whom had unresolved losses and
severely challenging behaviour. Four children were initially extremely disruptive to
teaching, and required a range of incentives279 that were only possible due to the
addition of extra support staff and learning support assistant time on a daily basis. All
children made academic progress, and due to the emotional needs of the SEN children
being addressed, the end of Key Stage levels of achievement in the remaining sixty per
cent of the class rose significantly in value added280, equalling those of the other two
Year Two classes.
However, lack of time and finance are unlikely to be the only reasons that schools do
not prioritise CPD, or writing a policy for daily death and loss. Despite children
obviously welcoming intervention, teachers’ attitudes to helping bereaved children have
been shown to affect their willingness to talk to them. Hopkirk (1988) suggests that
adults commonly perceive that ‘the pain of children is so distressing that it is very much
easier to devote our energies to working around them than to working directly with
them’ (Hopkirk 1988, cited by Kroll 1994: 29). This is likely to be the scenario for
teachers untrained in bereavement management and unsupported by an environment
in which death is not freely discussed. The 2014 Primary National Curriculum (NC) for
England clearly hinders progress. It states that ‘lessons should be planned to ensure
that there are no barriers to every pupil achieving (DfE 2013: 8, s. 4.3). There is,
however, no statement suggesting other than academic achievement.
The tendency for the restrictions in the curriculum to exacerbate the problem, is
illustrated in the new Primary National Curriculum (DfE: 2013) for science, which
expresses a statutory requirement that ‘Year Five should be taught to ‘describe the
changes as humans develop to old age’ (DfE 2013: 168). There is no mention of dying,
a discussion of which could naturally develop. It seems reasonable to expect that by
Year Five, some children might at least have experienced the death of a grandparent
or be doing so in the future and research suggests that shrouding a life-changing event
in mystery, and making it taboo, could detrimentally affect children’s psychological
wellbeing (Jackson and Colwell 2002, cited by Aris 2005: 50). Consequently, it can be
said that whilst the factors of finance, legislation and academic results, coupled with
constraints on teacher time, undoubtedly contribute to the lack of death education in
schools, it is nevertheless realistic to suggest that enduring cultural death denial of
279 These comprised: Social Stories, behaviour charts, Home-school books with positive
statements in, reward times, art therapy, extra ‘time’ out’ with a teaching assistant, extra support
during inputs and a daily behaviour log written by me and sent to the Educational Psychologist.
280 Some children moved up 3 to 4 assessment levels.